Laserfiche WebLink
Not Approved <br /> wishes to split the parcel into single family lots. The proposal would result in three (3) <br /> legal lots for single family home development. <br /> Mr. Boylan explained to the commission that the original plat had four lots, but that due <br /> to the City's current setbacks that the first lot would be rendered useless, thus the <br /> proposal of splitting the lot into 3 sections. All of the lots will meet the zoning guideline <br /> minimum size of 5,000 square feet. <br /> Motion by Baker, second by Schiferl to WAVIE THE READING AND ADOPT THE <br /> ATTACHED RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVING APPLICATION <br /> FP05-05. <br /> 6 Ayes, 0 Nays. MOTION CARRIED <br /> General Business: LP05-05 Site Plan Review Brighton Village Shopping Center <br /> Redevelopment. <br /> Consideration of a Site Plan Review for a commercial redevelopment of the existing <br /> Brighton Village Shopping Center. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing <br /> center and construct a restaurant, drug store, and other retail spaces within 6 separate <br /> buildings. The existing Champps restaurant, bank, and Sinclair station are not part of the <br /> proposed site plan,but existing shared parking between Champps and the bank will be <br /> reviewed in the context of meeting overall parking requirements. <br /> The parking easement between Champps and the bank was found acceptable. Cynthia <br /> Hable, Kraus-Anderson, addressed the commission and stated the redevelopment would <br /> be done in one phase, instead of the stages that had been proposed before. Architect <br /> Kathy Anderson presented to the commission the site plan that they are proposing and <br /> gave an overview of how the area will be redeveloped. Ms. Hable and Ms. Anderson <br /> addressed questions regarding from the Planning Commission. <br /> Mr. Jason Burton, resident, expressed a concern regarding existing the development and <br /> if the additional traffic had been taken into account. Ms. Hable stated that the <br /> development is providing less retail square footage and that there is not a grocery store, <br /> so there should not be a large increase of times with heavy traffic. Mr. Dan Dahms and <br /> Ms. Nancy Grant, residents, addressed the commission stating that they support the plan. <br /> Motion by Baker, Second by Zisla to WAIVE THE READING AND ADOPT THE <br /> ATTACHED RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING FINAL APPROVAL OF LP05- <br /> 05 subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. Approval of a permit by the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br /> 2. A final utility plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. <br /> 3. Snow plowing and snow storage data shall be submitted and approved by the City <br /> Planner. <br /> I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2005\4-19-05.doc 5 <br />