Laserfiche WebLink
Approved <br /> maximum is limiting. Mann replied that it may be difficult to say how many employees are too <br /> many. Schiferl added that by having a specific number of employees on the ordinance it will <br /> allow the City to enforce the ordinance if it should become an issue. <br /> MacKenzie approached the commission and stated that there will not be any vehicles left over <br /> night at the church,there will not be any signs, and he will not be in the church on a full time <br /> basis,his hours are a bit different than the nine to five. Schiferl stated that it could lead to a forty <br /> hour work week. MacKenzie replied that while it could be a full time job,he does not want to <br /> work that many hours and so plans to not be there full time. Baker reiterated that this ordinance <br /> is for the City in general and another caterer could decide to work that many hours. <br /> Motion by O'Brien, Second by Mann to CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br /> 7 Ayes, 0 Nays, MOTION CARRIED. <br /> Schiferl inquired from staff what"uses deemed similar by the City Council"might be and <br /> questioned if that statement should be in the ordinance. Gundlach replied that she was tying into <br /> the public uses language that is above that statement and a large number of ordinances have that <br /> statement. Zisla moved that the statement"uses deemed similar by the City Council"be struck <br /> from the ordinance. Schiferl asked how broad is the term"catering,"would it include different <br /> styles of preparation of food. Fernelius replied that catering is not defined with in the code,he <br /> added that the language is such to allow some flexibility for the Council. Schiferl suggested that <br /> the term"preparation of food"be substituted for"uses deemed similar by the City Council." <br /> Doffing stated that there are other uses that would fit into this ordinance that do not fit the term of <br /> catering. O'Brien added that all of these uses would have to pull a special use permit and the <br /> Council would have the final say. Zisla recommended to staff and the City Attorney to come up <br /> with precise language for this ordinance,he feels the current language is too broad. Fernelius <br /> replied that the staff would need directions on any additional uses the Commission would like to <br /> have placed in the ordinance. Mann and Baker replied that they are comfortable with how the <br /> ordinance currently reads, since all applicants would have to pull a special use permit and <br /> recommends no change to the ordinance. O'Keefe stated that he is concerned about allowing <br /> commercial uses on noncommercial properties. <br /> Motion by Schiferl, Second by Baker to WAIVE THE READING AND FORWARD THE PROPOSED <br /> CHANGES TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL WITH OF THE ZONING CODE AMENDMENT <br /> TO SECTION 4-030(8)(1)WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO Al,A2 AND A4. <br /> • Al Preparation of food by a third party using the facility for distribution or use <br /> offsite, to exist within the principal structure of the uses noted <br /> • A2 Overnight parking of vehicles or any outside storage of materials associated <br /> with the business is prohibited <br /> • A4 Number of employees associated with the use shall be limited to two (2), <br /> 5 Ayes,2 Nays. MOTION APPROVED. <br /> C:ADocuments and Settings\jgoepcALocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK28\04-18-2006 MINUTES.doc <br />