Laserfiche WebLink
Approved <br /> Chapter 26 of the City Code, which regulates the subdivision land, establishes park land <br /> dedication requirements for all new residential development. These requirements date <br /> back to the 1980's, however the fees never were imposed for commercial or industrial <br /> zoned property. While it is recognized that users of commercial and industrial zoned <br /> property benefit from the City's park system it became necessary to require a land and/or <br /> cash dedication at the time of subdivision. The attached Zoning Ordinance amendment <br /> establishes park land dedication requirements, in the form of land and/or cash <br /> contributions, for all newly subdivided commercial and industrial property. <br /> Much like the current residential dedication requirements, the proposed language requires <br /> ten percent of the total land being subdivided for dedication for parks, recreation, and <br /> usable open space. The City has the option to consider payment of a reasonable amount <br /> in lieu of land dedication where appropriate. The amount of land and/or cash <br /> contribution is based on the specific characteristics of the proposed subdivision and its <br /> intended use. <br /> Baker inquired who would determine if the applicant should give land or a cash <br /> dedication. Fernelius replied that the City would decide if the applicant can dedicate land <br /> or cash. Zisla asked how the amount of ten percent was decided. Gundlach replied the <br /> ten percent is based on what the residential applicants pay and a study done by Ingraham <br /> and Associates show that several cities in the area also charge ten percent. Zisla inquired <br /> if it was ten percent of the land area or ten percent of the market value. Gundlach replied <br /> that it's ten percent of the land being developed and if there is a cash dedication then it <br /> would be based off of the current market value. Zisla asked if in her research if she had <br /> uncovered anything that explains how the ten percent is related to the needs created by <br /> the use being developed on the property. Gundlach replied that she did not find anything <br /> in her research. Fernelius stated that New Brighton is one of the few cities that do not <br /> charge a commercial park dedication fee. He added that this ordinance would only take <br /> effect if the land is subdivided, which has not happened in the last two years that he <br /> knows of Northwest Quadrant will generate this fee, since it will be subdivided, and it <br /> will help pay for the public art that has been discussed at previous meetings. <br /> Schiferl replied that there should be a per unit charge for residential rather than a <br /> percentage base and it should be less for commercial. Fernelius replied that the City does <br /> have a fee per unit noted within the ordinance, but one is noted within the City's Fee <br /> Registrar. Zisla inquired how the City arrived at the fee for residential. Fernelius replied <br /> that the current fee is based on a survey of surrounding communities that was done by the <br /> former Parks and Recreation Director. Zisla replied that the amount of ten percent is <br /> arbitrary and the City needs to show how that money will be used. He added that just <br /> because surrounding communities are charging that price for the park dedication does not <br /> mean that New Brighton should with out showing the need for the support. Fernelius <br /> replied that he is not aware of any fee studies that have been done that relate to park <br /> dedication and the need for support,but staff would be willing to look into it more if <br /> directed by the Commission. Zisla replied that he is concerned with the need not of the <br /> C:ADocuments and Settings\igoepe 1ocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\0I.K28\04-18 2006 MINUTI?S.dot <br />