Laserfiche WebLink
Approved <br /> O'Brien inquired if any of the illegally placed signs have been a safety concern. <br /> Fernelius replied that the City is aware of two signs and they have not been an issue. <br /> Schiferl recommended that this be tabled until the church can approach MnDOT and the <br /> state to see if there can be a change in the manual. Baker agreed that more research <br /> needs to be done either by City staff or by the church. <br /> Bob Benke, President for the Church Council for Christ the King Lutheran Church, stated <br /> that over the last several years the MnDOT standards have been modified to <br /> accommodate area businesses,parks and zoos. The purpose of the guide signs is to help <br /> people arrive safely at their destination, to avoid congestion, and to avoid accidents. The <br /> church is asking the City to apply those same principals at a City street sign level. They <br /> believe that there are valid reasons to have signs at selected locations and they are <br /> recommending that the City keep this option open. <br /> O'Keefe inquired from Benke if the church would be willing to take the lead on the <br /> research. Benke replied that the church is made up of volunteers that do not have the <br /> expertise that the City staff does and recommends that staff take the lead and would be <br /> willing to work with the City in coming to a standard that would be beneficial. Zisla <br /> inquired if Benke feels that the MnDOT standards do not apply to the city street level. <br /> Benke replied that his understanding of the MnDOT manual on Uniform Traffic Control <br /> Devices is a general guideline that has many applications,but in all applications it is up <br /> to the professionals who administer that manual to make adjustments depending upon <br /> their application. Zisla replied that the Public Works Director's letter states that this type <br /> of signs would be in direct conflict with manual, which is state law. Benke replied that <br /> he has not had an opportunity to discuss this with the new Director, and does not know <br /> what has influenced his decision. <br /> O'Brien stated that he would like to see a sign standard for guide signs. Baker replied <br /> that he would like to see the City take the lead on this issue and possibly have several <br /> cities help come up with a standard sign that could be applied metropolitan wide. <br /> O'Keefe agrees with Benke that the highway informational signs have evolved, but does <br /> feel that it should be several cities that approach this issue and not just one. <br /> Howard inquired if staff knew of any cities that already have a standardized sign <br /> ordinance that they are applying on a local level that addresses these concerns. Gundlach <br /> replied that she had looked at the sign codes of the neighboring cities for the April <br /> meeting and did not find a similar sign code. She added that it is very difficult to <br /> establish zoning regulations for things that are happening in the right of way, which is <br /> why it is so important that the Public Works Director accept any proposed ordinance as <br /> the Public Works Director will be responsible for all items in the City right of way. <br /> Gundlach continued that it is possible that other cities have a standard that addresses this <br /> issue, however not within their zoning codes but rather in their street sections of their city <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br />