Laserfiche WebLink
Approved <br /> above. The applicants have also requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment as the <br /> property is currently guided in the New Brighton Comprehensive Plan for Light <br /> Industrial and the proposed use is considered Heavy Industrial. <br /> The Comprehensive Plan indicates that many of the industrial uses along the Old <br /> Highway 8 corridor are interim-type uses due to the level of contamination that exists on <br /> many of these properties. As noted within the applicants' submittal materials the <br /> property in question contains contamination and thus "there is no economical means" of <br /> developing the site in accordance with I-1 zoning requirements. The intention of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan is not whether the use can at any given time period be economically <br /> developed into the desired use. <br /> Because the zoning and guide plan must be consistent, the rezoning cannot be considered <br /> without first amending the Comprehensive Plan. This is in accordance with state law that <br /> requires official zoning and land use maps to be compatible. Both applications must <br /> either be approved or denied together. <br /> O'Brien asked if staff knew the length of the lease. Fernelius replied that he does not <br /> know the terms of the lease. Schiferl asked what companies signed the petition for the <br /> rezoning of the property, since the Commission has received letters of opposition to the <br /> rezoning. Fernelius read off the signer's names, which are a mix of New Brighton and <br /> Mounds View companies. An audience member stated that one of the signer's did not <br /> understand what the rezoning of the property was for, did not realize that the <br /> Comprehensive Plan was going to be amended. Fernelius replied that the Applicant <br /> submitted the following statement for the petition: "We the under sign respectfully <br /> petition for the rezoning of property located at 2200 Old Hwy 8 NW." He added that is <br /> all that is required by the code, since the petition applies only to the rezoning. <br /> John Stiengline, 2200 Old Hwy 8 NW, Vice President of Belair Excavating, approached <br /> the Council to answer questions and gave a brief history of the site. He stated that the <br /> Murlowski Company has explored potential uses for the site since their current operation <br /> only covers thirty to forty percent of the property. Since the history of the site makes it <br /> impossible to place a building on the site, it used to be a dump, the company decided to <br /> look at companies that did similar work. They had received a proposal from Midwest <br /> Asphalt and it seemed to be the best fit. <br /> Diane Speckter, Environmental and Water Resources Planner with Wank and Associates, <br /> stated that the site is currently being used in a heavy industrial manner, which is <br /> incompatible with a light industrial use. She added that the area just north of the site in <br /> Mounds View is zoned for light and heavy industrial uses. She stated that the site is <br /> unique for a number of reasons: there limited visibility of the site from the road, the <br /> adjacent properties and the parks, its history as a former landfill constrains is use as a <br /> light industrial site and make it more feasible as a heavy industrial use,power line towers <br /> on the site have a wide easement, and there is a storm sewer pipe that runs across the site. <br /> However, they believe that with the proposed use can these constrain can be worked <br /> around. There are perception problems with the site since it is a capped landfill the site is <br /> C:\Documents and Settings\jgoepe\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK28\10-17-2006.doc Page 2 of 9 <br />