My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SDOC1049
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Reports
>
2005
>
10-18-05
>
SDOC1049
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2021 6:47:50 PM
Creation date
4/16/2007 8:19:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br /> A variance may be granted from the literal provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in instances where <br /> strict enforcement would cause an undue hardship because of unique circumstances and when it is <br /> demonstrated that such a variance would be consistent with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The <br /> crucial points of the variance are: <br /> (1)Undue hardship. <br /> (2) Unique circumstances. <br /> (3) Applying to property. <br /> (4) Conformance with the comprehensive plan. <br /> (5)Variance shall not be detrimental to adjacent property or to the public as a whole. (Code of 2001) <br /> The applicant has submitted a statement addressing the variance criteria(attached). Their <br /> request is based on a revised proposal where the proposed addition does not encroach into the <br /> front yard setback any more than the existing garage. <br /> The applicant argues that the shape of lot is rare in the City and that the narrowing back yard <br /> is not appropriate for placing additional outbuildings there. The applicant further argues that <br /> the slope of lot is steep in the side yard and much steeper in the back yard(14 to 18% grade) <br /> which creates engineering, drainage and aesthetic problems that are prohibitive to overcome <br /> in a back yard garage option. <br /> I agree with the submitted argument and think the circumstances and hardship are unique <br /> to the property and if approved, will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties <br /> The Planning Commission should recommend approval for the revised site plan to the Council. <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 1. Waive the reading and adopt the attached resolution recommending approval of the front yard <br /> setback variance to the City Council. <br /> Patrick Boylan, City Planner <br /> I:\COMMIS SIONS\PLANNING\Reports\2005\10-18-05\VN05-03_2830 Forestdale Rd.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.