Laserfiche WebLink
<br />? <br /> How the tracks that run between MacGillis and Gibbs and Bell Pole affects the reuse of the property. <br />? <br /> Does rail service have market potential? <br />? <br /> How can the City speed up the planned the extension of County Road E2 across the railroad tracks? <br />? <br /> The Tom Thumb area to the north of MacGillis and Gibbs is identified as a redevelopment site in the <br />Old Highway 8 Corridor Plan <br />. It seems clear there should be a connection on how both sites are <br />used. <br />? <br /> The extension of County Road E2 may change the desired uses between the overpass of the railroad <br />tracks to County Road E and to the Dairy Queen area. <br />? <br /> The issue of how to deal with existing businesses as the area is redeveloped. For example, the <br />minimum industrial lot sizes. <br />? <br /> Should we encourage heavy industrial, light industrial, or high-tech uses on those sites? <br /> <br />The Planning Commission ideas on any of these questions or others will be most helpful. <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />Baker asked what the calls for in the area. Locke responded the plan talks in general <br />Old Highway 8 Corridor Plan <br />about industrial use, but most of the plan directs the reader to the for the Old <br />Highway 8 sites. <br /> <br />Mattila said the zoning along the railroad tracks is light industrial and the sites along Old Highway 8 are <br />commercial. South of the Tri-City Legion is industrial. <br /> <br />Baker asked if the railroad track that serves MacGillis and Gibbs is also an active track in general. What are <br />the chances of vacating that track? <br /> <br />Locke responded staff will research the uses of the track. Baker commented the track limited the uses for the <br />MacGillis and Gibbs site. <br /> <br />Locke said the site was about 25 acres. Most of the site is long and narrow, even at the narrowest spot it is <br />about 200 feet or more deep. Should the site be divided into two large parcels or is it more realistic to have a <br />series of smaller parcels? New Brighton may have the opportunity to free up part of the site in the next year <br />or two, even while the cleanup activity is going on. <br /> <br />Baker asked who owns the site now. Locke responded MacGillis and Gibbs. The Federal government has <br />placed an environmental lien on the property for more than $1 million, and all of the cleanup costs will <br />ultimately be placed as a lien against that property, that could be millions of dollars. MacGillis and Gibbs <br />will probably go out of business. New Brighton would like to redevelop the site soon. <br /> <br />Williams said an EDC member wondered if the track should be viewed as a plus. <br /> <br />Baker remarked most uses that would need trackage would be relatively large buildings. Locke said he would <br />agree with Baker, but from the tax base perspective may not be what the City envisions for the site. <br /> <br />Williams said it was his personal view that, if the trackage were abandoned for one reason or another, the <br />City should try to preserve that rail corridor throughout the length of the City as a recreational corridor. <br /> <br />Locke stated apparently traffic has increased on the track because it is being used as a turnaround. The <br />increase has been a concern for the Fire Department because it has increased the time some east/west streets <br />are blocked. <br /> <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1995\07-18-95.WPD <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />