Laserfiche WebLink
Pickering stated he wanted to talk about the drainage on the site. After the shopping center and Salem Baptist <br />Church was constructed, the homes on Mounds Avenue have water in their basements. Water collects in the <br />backyards. Some neighbors had to put drain tile systems in their basements. Tri stated he has suffered about a <br />$10,000 loss on his property. Tri stated he had to install a drain tile system and completely redo a bedroom <br />and a bathroom on the lower level because of mold. Six weeks after Tri moved into the house, his daughter <br />developed asthma due to the mold. An environmental health and safety person from the University came out <br />to Tri’s house and took a mold sample that showed high mold levels. Tri stated he opposed a business that <br />would be open long hours on the site. <br /> <br />Zisla asked if someone has determined where the water comes from that caused the mold problems in Tri’s <br />home. Tri responded the City Engineer said the runoff came from the vacant lot. Salem Baptist Church had a <br />flood in its parking lot where vehicles were damaged. The 12-inch pipe from the church parking lot drains <br />toward Mounds Avenue. Tri said he had pictures of flooded parked cars and a lake in Tri’s backyard. The <br />shutoff the City installed should be reversed to allow relief from the water on Mounds Avenue first, then the <br />Church should be next. <br /> <br />Zisla asked Teague about the drainage plan. Teague repeated the engineering staff was satisfied with the <br />proposed drainage plan. Tri stated he has two sumps in his home and drain tile. Tri stated his sump pumps <br />every five minutes daily and more often during rain. Eighty percent of the water comes from the lot in <br />question. Zisla stated he was concerned about the remarks about the drainage from Salem Baptist Church. <br />The remarks are discouraging because the Planning Commission reviewed their site plan and had no idea such <br />flooding would occur. Tri responded that the problem is that the pipe sizes are backward. The 12 inch pipe <br />service Mounds Avenue and the 8-inch pipe should serve the church. <br /> <br />Zisla stated he had some concern about the hours of operation. The zoning ordinance does not deal with the <br />hours of operation. Under the Special Use Permit, however, the hours become fair game. Hilger responded <br />that Hollywood Video is requesting a Special Use Permit strictly for the parking setback. The City has <br />granted such Special Use Permits to other businesses in the past for precisely the same purpose. If the <br />Commission limits the hours, Hollywood Video would appeal that decision to the Council or would withdraw <br />its Special Use Permit request and build a smaller building. Zisla stated it may be appropriate to know how <br />many cars are present late in the evening. Hilger stated there would be few cars in the lot during the late <br />hours. <br /> <br />Zisla asked if berming would alleviate the light problem. Hilger stated berming may interfere with drainage. <br />Hilger showed the drainage on the site plan. The site will require fill to drain to Silver Lake Road. The only <br />water still directed to the northeast would be the from the setback or current landscape area. Hilger outlined <br />the drainage plan on the site plan. Eighty percent of the water, including the rooftop drainage, will go to <br />Silver Lake Road. A berm on the north side could exacerbate the drainage problem. It could serve as a dam. <br />Zisla stated that a berm should be considered. Hilger stated he would work with Staff on the berming. <br /> <br />Tri stated Hollywood Video should berm the north and the east side of the site. If the runoff goes to Silver <br />Lake Road, it will run on Silver Lake Road for about 100 yards and run into Mounds Avenue. Hilger stated <br />that putting a berm on the east side will wipe out the existing vegetation. That would open the site and reduce <br />the screening. <br /> <br />Zisla said the vegetation could be replanted. Landscaping and berming would be studied during a regular site <br />plan review. Hilger stated the existing screening on the east side is substantial. O’Brien asked about the <br />contours on the grading plan. Hilger responded the contours are one-foot contours. O’Brien stated the back <br />corner of the site would be raised five or six feet. Hilger responded affirmatively; the parking lot would be <br />level to allow for drainage. O’Brien asked how the grading would work on the reverse plan. Hilger answered <br />the parking lot drainage would be the same, but two feet of the foundation would be exposed. <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1999\06-15-99.WPD <br />7 <br /> <br />