Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ap <br /> Minutes <br />pr <br /> <br /> New Brighton Planning Commission <br /> Regular Meeting - July 20, 1999 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br />ov <br /> <br />Call to Order <br />Larry Baker, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />ed <br />Roll Call <br /> Present: <br /> <br />Larry Baker, Mike Livingston, Jim O’Brien, Norm Schiferl <br /> , <br />Jeff Schopf, Paul Zisla <br /> <br />Absent: <br /> David Schmitz <br />: <br />Also Present <br /> Cary Teague, City Planner <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br />J15,1999,P <br />Motion by Schiferl seconded by Zisla <br />TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE UNE LANNING <br />C. <br /> 6 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion Carried. <br />OMMISSION MEETING <br /> <br />Report on Council Action <br />- None <br /> <br />Agenda Review <br />The agenda was adopted as written. <br /> <br />Public Hearings <br />Special Use Permit and Site Plan Review Haugland Company/Corporate Express <br />Teague stated that the applicant has requested that the item be continued. The applicant has submitted a letter <br />requesting an extension of the sixty-day review period to one hundred twenty days. If the applicant does not <br />come forward during this time, the applicant will formally have to withdraw the request or the Planning <br />Commission and City Council must action on the request. <br /> <br />. <br />Motion by Baker, seconded by Zisla, 6 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion <br />TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING <br />Carried. <br /> <br />General Business <br />Special Use Permit and Site Plan Review Freeway Towing <br />Teague reviewed the planning report on a request for a Special Use Permit and Site Plan Review for constructing <br />a new facility for Freeway Towing at 501 5th Street SW. <br /> <br />Schiferl asked if the site could hold an additional building. Teague responded stated the site has space only for <br />the building under consideration. The project would be a one-phase, one-building project. <br /> <br />Baker asked about the draft resolution, Item No. 8, “A letter from NSP stating their approval of the tree planting <br />and parking area within their easement must be submitted to the City.” Has this been done before? Was this <br />required for the development at Cleveland Avenue and County Road D? Teague responded that the City did not <br />require NSP approval on the Cleveland and D project, although a portion of the project was within the easement. <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1999\07-20-99.WPD <br /> <br />