12-21-99 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

B.Two (2) or more persons all of whom are related by blood, marriage, adoption, or foster care arrangement living together as a single housekeeping unit. C.A group of not more than four (4) persons not so related, maintaining a single housekeeping unit. Baker stated the new language would answer his concerns. Zisla asked what impact would that language have on four people and one of the kids’ friends stays with them. Baker said that would be a family of four and one non-family person. That person would qualify as a boarder. Thomsen stated that changing the language in the accessory use provision on roomers or boarders to: “C. ...whether for compensation or not for compensation.” Zisla asked if that would be permitted. Thomsen answered affirmatively. O’Brien asked Holsten if there was a reason she increased the number in that paragraph from two to three. Holsten responded she did that to avoid adding the four people to the main definition of family. Baker stated that adding the language saying a family is four or more unrelated people made it possible for two more people. Thomsen said that would be only two more people. Baker said then there would be six unrelated people living in a household. Thomsen answered affirmatively. Thomsen said that each person could not have two more people. Baker said that there could be six rather than the four the Commission recommends. Thomsen said that the language could be changed to “one.” O’Brien asked if there is a reason for not having the accessory use apply when there are four unrelated individuals. The Commission discussed the language in the accessory use section. Baker asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak at the public hearing. No one responded. PH. Motion by Baker, seconded by O’Brien, 5 Ayes - O Nays. Motion TO CLOSE THE UBLIC EARING Carried. Motion by Baker, TO ACCEPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THE DEFINITION OF FAMILY WITH THE :A-“.”T, FOLLOWING CHANGES SEMICOLON BE INSERTED AFTER THE WORD INDIVIDUAL HE WORDS “”“.”A-“ ALL OF WHOM AFTER THE WORD PERSON SEMICOLON AFTER THE WORD HOUSEKEEPING .”A.I, UNIT ND CHANGE THE FOUR PERSONS TO THREE PERSONS NOT SO RELATED N ADDITION AMEND S4.020“PAU-R1D”“ ECTION ERMITTED CCESSORY SES ISTRICT TO ADD THE WORDS WHETHER FOR .” COMPENSATION OR NOT FOR COMPENSATION The Commission discussed the number of unrelated people allowed under the proposed motion. Baker asked for a second to his motion. Not hearing any, Baker declared the motion dead. Schiferl asked Baker to restate his motion. Motion by Baker, seconded by Zisla, TO ACCEPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THE DEFINITION OF :A- FAMILY WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES SEMICOLON BE INSERTED AFTER THE WORD “.”T,“T,, INDIVIDUAL HE WORDS WO OR MORE PERSONS ALL OF WHOM RELATED BY BLOOD ,, MARRIAGE ADOPTION OR FOSTER CARE ARRANGEMENTS LIVING TOGETHER AS A SINGLE ; HOUSEKEEPING UNIT OR A GROUP OF NOT MORE THAN FOUR PERSONS NOT SO RELATED MAINTAIN A ” COMMON HOUSEHOLD AND USING COMMON COOKING AND KITCHEN FACILITIES AND THEN TO S4.020“PAU-R1D”“ AMEND ECTION ERMITTED CCESSORY SES ISTRICT TO KEEPING OF NOT MORE ,, THAN A TOTAL OF TWO BOARDERS OR ROOMERS BY A FAMILY RELATED BY BLOOD MARRIAGE OR ,.” ADOPTION FOR COMPENSATION OR NOT FOR COMPENSATION 5 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion Carried. General Business - None I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1999\12-21-99.WPD 6