My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-00
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Minutes-Board Or Commission PLZ 00900
>
2000
>
03-21-00
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 12:21:04 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 12:21:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Northwest Quadrant consists of 100 acres and is zoned for mixed uses--commercial, retail, and <br />residential. Apartments could be an element in that redevelopment area. The area of the Tom Thumb hill is <br />also zoned multi-family. <br /> <br />Kraus thanked the Planning Commission for its time on this project and for the City of New Brighton. New <br />Brighton is a good city and Kraus said he would like to see it stay that way. Kraus said he had talked with <br />residents and the Council concerning the future in New Brighton. The future does not look really good at this <br />point because the schools are being filled and we are seeing low-income housing coming into the City. Some <br />of that housing that was decent is deteriorating. Undesirable people are coming in. Over one-third of New <br />Brighton’s housing is apartment and rental properties. When the senior citizens’ complex by New Market is <br />complete, and if these other projects are built, one-half of New Brighton could be multi-family. Kraus said <br />that would be a problem for New Brighton. The best apartment building begins to deteriorate after fifteen <br />years. Soon, New Brighton will be like Columbia Heights or Northeast Minneapolis. The City must be very <br />careful with the type of apartments and that the existing apartments will be regulated to protect the citizens of <br />New Brighton. There is a serious problem here, such as police calls and problems at the Family Service <br />Center. The taxpayers should be safe at the Family Service Center. We have more than 1,200 signers to the <br />petition regarding apartments. Kraus asked the Planning Commission to take a very serious look at the type <br />of housing allowed in New Brighton. Kraus stated New Brighton is over its quota of low-income and <br />subsidized housing. New Brighton should not build any more apartments and keep the existing ones <br />regulated. The people in New Brighton do not want any more apartments and are very concerned about what <br />is happening in our schools. <br /> <br />Livingston said he would like to respond to Kraus’ comments. Kraus mentioned affordable housing. New <br />Brighton has met the requirement set forth by the Metropolitan Council. New Brighton is lacking high-end <br />housing and is high in affordable housing. The problem is that the Comprehensive Plan sets the zoning. If a <br />proposal comes to the City and the property is zoned for such a project, the Planning Commission must vote <br />for approval or the applicant can sue the City, which it would likely lose. The Comprehensive Plan has <br />recently been reviewed, rewritten, and adopted by the City and has been submitted to the Met Council. To <br />comply with Kraus’ request, the Comprehensive Plan would have to be changed. To change the <br />Comprehensive Plan, Kraus should contact the Council. The Council would have to recommend that the <br />Planning Commission review the Comp Plan. <br /> <br />Kraus responded he has let the Council know about his group’s opposition to apartment buildings. <br />Townhouses are not as big a problem. The residents on the south side of New Brighton are feeling insecure <br />about apartments. <br /> <br />Schopf stated that property owners have rights. If a person owns a piece of property and it is zoned <br />appropriate to a proposal, is it not unfair to such owners if there is a groundswell against it? Kraus responded <br />that residents have not paid enough attention to zoning in the past. If a property is zoned mult-family, not <br />much can be done to block development. However, the property at Tom Thumb or in the Old Highway 8 <br />Corridor has been rezoned. That rezoning is pending. Things have gotten carried away in Columbia Heights. <br />The taxpayers have been paying three ways. First, they pay to develop the properties and to support programs <br />to take care of the people in those multi-family developments. Third, the taxpayers of Columbia Heights have <br />been paying to tear them down. Kraus said he did not want to see that situation here in New Brighton. <br /> <br />Schiferl stated that he wanted the record to show his answers to some of Kraus’ issues. Kraus made <br />statements about multi-family housing, “low” housing, and subsidized housing. Kraus also made statements <br />about undesirable people. Schiferl said he disputed statements about rental housing. Schiferl’s parents will be <br />going into rental property in the area. There are many situations where rental housing is very desirable. <br />Having an entire community that is only owner-occupied homes does not make sense. Picking on rental <br />housing in general is not fair. Kraus also made a correlation between rental housing and “undesirable” people. <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\2000\03-21-00.WPD <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.