Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Sawyer said the adjacent homeowners do not support this development, and feel the City supports this proposal as a <br />way to create tax revenue. Baker said the Planning Commission reviews proposals as they pertain to City Code, and a <br />property owner has right to develop their property according to City Code. Baker added that the property owner <br />(Church) had not intended to develop the property for church use. <br />No other public comment received. <br /> <br />CLOSE THE HEARING <br />Motion by Livingston, seconded by Schmitz, to . 6 Ayes - 0 Nays, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />st <br />Baker requested one condition of approval be added, “Lot 3 would not be allowed curb cut on 1 St. NW.” <br /> <br />WAIVE THE READING AND ADOPT THE RESOLUTION <br />Motion by Zisla, seconded by Schiferl, to <br />RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PL00-4, SUBJECT TO THE <br />FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: <br />1.ALL HOMES WITHIN PROPOSED SUBDIVISION MEET CITY’S MINIMUM SETBACK <br /> <br />REQUIREMENTS FOR R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. <br />2.GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY <br /> <br />ENGINEER. <br />3.EACH NEW HOME PROPOSED FOR CONSTRUCTED WITHIN SUBDIVISION MUST SUBMIT A <br /> <br />GRADING PLAN WITH THEIR APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. SAID GRADING PLANS <br />MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL GRADING PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THE <br />FINAL PLAT. <br />4.UTILITY PLAN SHALL BE REVISED PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY ENGINEER. <br /> <br />THE SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONS SHOULD BE REVISED FROM THE PROPOSED “RISERS” <br />TO INDIVIDUAL CONNECTIONS OFF OF THE SEWER LINE. THE PROPOSED WATER MAIN WILL <br />TH <br />LIKELY HAVE TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE WEST HALF OF 10 AVENUE, AS THERE IS <br />INADEQUATE ROOM IN THE BOULEVARD. <br />5.APPROVAL OF A PERMIT BY THE RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT. NO BUILDING <br /> <br />PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL APPROVAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM RICE CREEK. <br />6.PARK DEDICATION FEES ($750 PER LOT) SHALL BE DUE AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT <br /> <br />APPLICATION. <br />7.PRIOR TO THE GRADING OF THE SITE, SILT FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND LEFT IN <br /> <br />PLACE UNTIL BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE SEEDED OR SODDED, TO <br />PREVENT EROSION INTO THE ADJACENT CREEK AND TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. <br />ST <br />8.LOT 3 WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED CURB CUT ON 1 ST. NW. <br /> <br /> <br />6 Ayes - 0 Nays, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Livingston said it is not unusual that homes in neighborhoods are of different real estates values, and actually it is <br />beneficial to live near a higher value home because it then reflects positively on your property’s value. <br /> <br />Teague presented a rezoning of Beach’s Long Lake Service Station, 2251 Long Lake Road, from R-2, Two Family <br />Residential to B-3, General Business. The request would bring the site into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan <br />which calls for the future land use to be community business. <br /> <br />The following criteria shall be considered: <br />·proposed action has been considered in relation to specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be <br /> <br />consistent with the Comp Plan <br />·proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area <br /> <br />·proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area <br /> <br />·proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service <br /> <br />capacity. <br /> <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\2000\7-18-00.WPD <br /> <br /> <br />