08-19-97 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Baker responded that the Proof of Parking covers the south area of the site. Mattila showed the Proof of Parking area on the site plan. Schreyer asked about the proposed road. Mattila said there is an existing road behind the building that would be located farther to the west. Schreyer asked if the light near they would move his property line closer to his lot. Chet Harrison, representing Remmele Engineering, stated they would work with Mr. Schreyer on the lighting. The Police Department requires the light. Schreyer stated Remmele is a good neighbor, but he was concerned about a wall. The original plan shows a berm, but that did not work out for some reason. Mattila responded there were several discussions with the neighbors and the agreement reached was to waive the berm for privacy fencing. Mark Murlowski, 136 12th Avenue SW, stated that he had concerns when Remmele originally proposed the project. Murlowski said he was concerned about traffic and appearance of the project. The building is attractive and has generated no truck traffic. The Remmele building acts as a noise barrier from the railroad. Murlowski stated he just wanted to say that Remmele is a good neighbor. Pete Morrell, 97 13th Avenue SW, asked what the use would be for the proposed addition. Harrison said the use would be the same as now. Morrell asked if there would be an increase in traffic or noise. Harrison responded the conditions would be the same as today. Schmitz said, since he was not on the Commission when they originally approved the project, he would like a couple points clarified. Was the expansion not approved then but was understood there would be future expansion? Mattila responded that was correct. Schmitz asked, if this building changed ownership, would that affect the neighborhood. Mattila responded the I-3 District is the most restrictive industrial district since it borders on residential property and park land. RALP-328, Motion by Schiferl, seconded by Schmitz, TOECOMMEND PPROVAL OF SUBJECT TO . 6 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion Carried. CONDITIONS LP-329 Belair Builders Inc. Terry reviewed the case report concerning an application for site plan review to construct an addition onto an existing industrial building. Terry showed slides of the site and reviewed the site plan on the overhead projector. Baker said the addition would be very good and will help upgrade the area. The applicant was present. Baker asked if anyone had a question for the applicant and there was no response. LP-329. Motion by Baker, seconded by O’Brien, 6 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF Carried. Announcements and Updates Concept Review - buildings for boat and auto storage Belair Builders Mattila reviewed the memo and concept plan submitted by Belair Builders for storage buildings on the west side of the Belair Builders property on the northern border of New Brighton next to Long Lake Park. Schiferl asked if the area were part of the Old Highway 8 Corridor plan in the new Comprehensive Plan. Mattila answered negatively. 7 I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1997\08-19-97.WPD