10-21-97 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

opinion was that, since the City indicated 101 units were appropriate for that site, the City would be hard pressed to stop the applicant from doing so. However, the City Attorney pointed out there was no park dedication ordinance in place then. Therefore, City Attorney was unsure of the City’s ability to hold development to 72 units or allow the 101 units. Schmitz asked if the primary parking would have direct access to Meadowwood Park. Mattila answered park access would be from the northwest parking lot of the proposed coop facility, either around or over the proposed ponding area. Also, there is a proposed emergency vehicle access easement over the proposed underground tunnel area. The easement can be used for access to the park as well. The emergency vehicle easement would be from Erickson’s New Market parking lot. Schmitz asked if the Parks, Recreation and Environmental Commission had a problem with the access. Schmitz commented that this summer there were four or five hundred kids participating in soccer programs at Meadowwood being dropped off and there was no parking available. Mattila said Maurie Anderson, the Parks and Recreation Director, met with the Parks Commission. Anderson said they would want to have a shared parking agreement if this proposal were approved. The shared parking agreement would be for the stalls in that northwest corner because there would be soccer programs in the evenings. Anderson felt the parking lot would be adequate to accommodate these programs. Zisla asked if any City-owned park parking would be eliminated by this proposed project. Mattila responded there is no publicly owned parking, except the public right-of-way that is 27th Avenue and 21st Street. Brightondale has a parking easement on the Rice Creek Shopping Center site, but there is no City-owned parking involved. Baker stated the City owns parking rights on the existing shopping center through a shared agreement given by the original developer. Mattila said he was not aware of that agreement. Baker said he shared Schmitz’s concern about the parking for Meadowwood Park. The proposal makes Meadowwood Park a private park and that is not acceptable. Schiferl asked Baker how many parking spaces are there under the existing agreement with Rice Creek Center versus the proposed parking for the coop on the northeast side. Baker responded he did not recall. Zisla said Baker’s comment puzzled him. Zisla stated he understood it is a privately owned property with a driveway that goes with the shopping center. Baker answered affirmatively. Zisla asked how taking away a private driveway and converting the shopping center to housing is interfering with the use of the park. Zisla said he did not understand the public aspect of that. Baker answered the existing parking is adjacent to the park and the developer gave the City the right to use that parking for the park. The City owns the right to use that parking lot. Baker said the area behind the existing shopping center building by that roadway is shared parking with Brightondale and shared parking for the park and is part of the development agreement. Zisla asked if these were the parking stalls behind the vacant Rice Creek Shopping Center. Baker answered affirmatively. Mattila asked if the area dedicated for the overflow is the area dedicated for parking for Meadowwood Park. Baker responded affirmatively. Knuth asked if the City had done any analysis of the parking density and the parking in areas around the proposed development. Is there sufficient parking now to meet the needs of the youth, for shopping, and for visiting at Brightondale? Mattila said the City did a parking analysis of the coop, New Market, the remaining 18,000 square feet for Snyder’s and the Pizza Factory/Spectacle Shoppe area. When the owners constructed the Pizza Factory/Spectacle Shoppe building, the parking was construed to be adequate. The remaining stalls I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1997\10-21-97.WPD 6