My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-98
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Minutes-Board Or Commission PLZ 00900
>
1998
>
01-20-98
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 1:00:27 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 1:00:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Olson said the 28th Avenue group would like the Planning Commission to vote no on the proposed <br />Alzheimer's unit, make a recommendation for a correction of the current drainage problems and to make the <br />greenspace a permanent easement. Olson thanked the Planning Commission for its time and for supporting <br />the 28th Avenue neighbors in the past. <br /> <br />Eileen Brama, 2703 Mississippi Street, said the ultimate goal of a developer is to acquire land and develop <br />the land with a minimum of expense and a maximum of profit. They propose to place a three to three and a <br />half story building in a community where it is not compatible with the surrounding area. The ultimate goal of <br />the city is to review and accept or reject proposals based on the benefit to the community and the increase in <br />tax base. The developer thinks the coop project is needed and would benefit the community, but at whose <br />expense? In the past, the City accepted a developer's proposal to place a building in a community where it <br />was not compatible. The compensation to the community was to be a higher tax base and a park. Again, the <br />City is considering a project that is not compatible with the area and will greatly impact the residents of the <br />area both aesthetically and economically. Brama said she was aware that this project would replace a <br />distressed parcel of land. Brama said she hoped the City would be responsible and consider a project that <br />would compliment the site and appease the residents whom it will affect. Brama said her neighbors would be <br />adversely affected economically should the Alzheimer's unit be approved. Brama thanked the Planning <br />Commission for their time. <br /> <br />Alma Stepanchak, 2180 27th Avenue NW, stated her home is across the street from the proposed three and a <br />half story coop. Stepanchak said she was disappointed that the neighbors on 27th were not included in any of <br />the discussions with the developer or in any of the meetings called on this subject. Our property is just as <br />much affected by the coop as the 28th people are affected by the proposed Alzheimer's unit. Stepanchak said <br />that offended her and she felt that, as a resident, she should have been just as important as anyone else. I am <br />directly across the street from the proposed coop. The Planning Commission received a copy of our concerns <br />last month. Stepanchak said her main concern was the height of the three and a half story coop and would <br />affect her privacy. Stepanchak said the proposed coop would decrease the property value of her home, which <br />she just built last year. Stepanchak said she looked at a three and a half story apartment building across from <br />the Family Service Center and tried to visualize what the coop would be like and she cried. The Rice Creek <br />Center should be developed, but should be one or one and a half stories like the other businesses nearby. <br />There will be increased traffic from the proposed ninety-seven units. Stepanchak thanked the Commission for <br />its time and consideration, but was disappointed the 27th Avenue people were not included in any meetings. <br /> <br />Mattila responded the City was not invited, but the developer included the neighbors on 27th in the <br />neighborhood meeting they held in the fall and notices were sent of the public hearing. Stepanchak said she <br />only received one letter on the first meeting at Brightondale and after that she received no notifications. <br />Mattila responded the developer is required to obtain a certified list of property owners within 600 feet of the <br />site from Ramsey County and those property owners are notified by the City. It could be her name was <br />somehow not included on that list. However, those property owners were only notified once and that was for <br />the October Planning Commission meeting. From that point on, meeting dates were announced at the <br />conclusion of each public meeting and Mattila recalls her attending most if not all of those meetings. <br />Furthermore, the City is not obligated to notify property owners by mail of a public hearing, it is a courtesy <br />the City extends to it’s residents. A public hearing notice published in the paper is the only requirement of the <br />City. <br /> <br />Yvonne Bessler, 2704 21st Street NW, stated she lives across the street from the north edge of the park and <br />has a view of the park and Brightondale. Bessler said she agreed with statements made by Olson and <br />Stepanchak. Bessler said she was also concerned about parking for the park. Bessler noticed about forty cars <br />parked behind Rice Creek Center when there are activities at the park. Where are those cars going to go? Will <br />people have to stop using the park? The only place they can park is on 21st and in Erickson's parking lot. <br /> <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1998\01-20-98.WPD <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.