01-20-98 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PH. Motion by Baker, seconded by Livingston, 7 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion TO CLOSE THE UBLIC EARING Carried. LP-336VN-317. Motion by Livingston, seconded by Knuth, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AND Baker stated he does not feel the contamination problem warrants the parking variance. Baker said, he would, however, allow the variance because the landscape design on the corner takes away from parking space on the site and the landscape will enhance the site. Baker said, therefore, what the City is giving up on one hand is more than compensated in the overall design of the site. Wells said the landscape would not only enhance the site, but will be very special when combined with the City’s proposed streetscape. Mattila said in addition to the contamination on site which is restricting the buildable area, the Soo Line Company owns 40 feet of railroad right-of-way that they could have vacated and added to the Donatelle site. However, the right-of-way could not be vacated because there is an underground pipeline in the right-of-way that cannot be relocated which further adds to the site constraints. Zisla stated he would vote for the variance for the reasons stated in the resolution. Zisla commented the fact that the City was getting additional landscaping on the front corner does not meet the hardship criteria. The fact the railroad right-of-way cannot be vacated is significant. Zisla said he is making clear his reasons for recommending approval, because he does not want the Planning Commission to set a precedent in granting a variance based on landscape improvements. Zisla stated Super Fund sites are unique in terms of land development and provides adequate grounds on which to approve a variance. Knuth said, for the record, she drives by the present Donatelle plant almost daily and it is an extraordinarily handsome sight. Donatelle has taken extra measures to present beautiful landscaping and a well-maintained site. Wells commented Donatelle cannot have a fountain as on their present site because the EPA will not allow a pond on the site. However, we will do something just as effective. Baker called for a vote on the motion. 7 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion Carried. GB ENERAL USINESS LP-331, PRD-59 and PL-258 G & P Properties Mattila reviewed the case report concerning an application for site plan review, PRD, a minor subdivision to construct a 20-unit Alzheimer’s addition onto the Brightondale senior housing facility and replace a portion of the Rice Creek Shopping Center with a 97-unit senior independent living facility. Mike Gould of G & P Properties stated that talking about changes we made since our proposal was last before the Planning Commission seems appropriate. Steve Larson of the City Council provided G & P Properties with a list of sixteen issues on which we needed to focus. We met with Mr. Larson, the Mayor and Ron Olson of the neighbors’ group on 28th Avenue and covered the sixteen points. Gould said he would address some of the issues for the Planning Commission. Gould referred to the item dealing with the use of the setback on the west side of the site to be used as a walk area. Gould said their new plan reflected that requirement. The item requiring a signed legal agreement that the Alzheimer’s wing would never exceed one story is no problem and G & P will comply. Regarding the item dealing with installing underground parking under the Alzheimer’s wing, we are going to have to go underground with the parking because we have moved the building as far east as possible. On the item about using all underground parking slots for guests, we have at least twenty-two slots that we will designate for guests. If we find, as time goes on, that we can add to that number, we will do so. We discussed the item I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1998\01-20-98.WPD 3