My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-98
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Minutes-Board Or Commission PLZ 00900
>
1998
>
10-20-98
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 1:06:29 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 1:06:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Schiferl asked Teague about the Code. According to the Code, the lot should be paved. Therefore, why was <br />the Commission even considering this proposal? Teague responded that it is clear the use is vehicle sales no <br />matter how the vehicles are advertised. Teague said the Code was clear that bituminous paving and curbing <br />are required. <br /> <br />Cook answered that the lot is currently not paved. The surrounding properties are industrial uses and are <br />currently not paved as well. This small one-acre parcel is surrounded by other unpaved commercial <br />properties. Schiferl stated he understood Cook’s point. However, the City requires nonconforming uses to be <br />brought into compliance at the time of any change of use or site improvement. <br /> <br />Teague responded the existing use can continue until the use changes. Ryder is introducing a new use in <br />vehicle sales and as such a Special Use Permit is required. As part of the review for the Special Use Permit, <br />the City would require the paving and curbing, landscaping, and setback per the City Code. <br /> <br />Cook said vehicle sales take place there now as part of the current business. Townhome Maintenance is no <br />longer there. That property was sold by the owner, Joe Noonan, to Ken Beach, who owns Holiday Truck <br />Equipment. Holiday Truck Equipment does heavy duty truck and tractor repair. Most of the vehicles serviced <br />by Holiday Truck Equipment belong to Ryder. The sales aspect of Ryder is commercial customers to <br />commercial customers. Ryder customers are not walk-in customers. However, the public would not be <br />prohibited from coming in to buy a truck for a personal use. Ninety-five percent of Ryder’s customers are <br />responding to information advertised in trade publications. Ryder’s current location in Roseville does not <br />generate much traffic. Ryder would work closely with the maintenance provider before selling the vehicles. <br />Approximately twenty-eight vehicles would be for sale, parked in the back and left side of the site. The entire <br />right side of the site is used for vehicles waiting to have maintenance done. When Ryder sells a vehicle, it is <br />maintained to DOT standards. <br />The front part of the property is paved where the customers would enter the building. <br /> <br />Cook said Ryder’s use would be commercial sales to commercial end users. Cook asked if the proposed use <br />should be classified as vehicle sales. Was that the intent of the Ordinance when it was drafted? Under State <br />and Federal reporting, Ryder’s classification is vehicle rental and leasing, not vehicle sales. Is there a way to <br />classify the proposed use as something other than vehicle sales? The lot does need maintenance and <br />upgrading. Ryder intends to do so. Ryder is image conscious and that is the reason Ryder would demolish the <br />quonset building. The lot has not been maintained and work needs to be done. Ryder wants to improve the <br />site. However, the economics of paving did not make sense to Ryder. <br /> <br />Schopf asked Teague if Ryder was going to use the site only for vehicle leasing, would they still need a <br />Special Use Permit. Teague responded affirmatively. Leasing would still be a new use being introduced to <br />this site. <br /> <br />Schiferl stated maintenance is occurring on the site, but if Ryder parked the vehicles somewhere else before <br />making arrangements to sell them. Then, Ryder would not be selling them on the site. Cook said Ryder is <br />actually staging the vehicles at its Roseville site. Schiferl stated he was trying to see if there were any way <br />Ryder could continue as a nonconforming use. <br /> <br />Teague said the sale of vehicles could not take place on the site without getting a Special Use Permit. Schiferl <br />stated Ryder would have to move the vehicles to their other location to sell them. <br /> <br />Cook stated Ryder appreciates the opportunity to have this informal discussion with the Planning <br />Commission. Ryder does not intend to bypass the City Code. Since Holiday is presently doing Ryder’s <br />vehicle maintenance, which consists of removing decals, body touch up, cleaning the interiors and preparing <br />the vehicles for sale. Ryder’s primary maintenance is done at its Roseville location. <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1998\10-20-98.WPD <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.