10-18-2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Approved November 15, 2005 The submitted survey indicates a driveway encroachment into the side yard setback. The required setback is 5 feet; the applicant plans to construct the accessory structure first, and then re-pave his driveway in the spring of 2006. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Motion by Zisla, Second Schiferl by to MOTION CARRIED. 5 Ayes, 0 Nays, After additional discussion by the Commission and Staff there was a Motion by Schiferl WAIVE THE READING AND ADOPT THE ATTACHED Second by O’Keefe to RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SP 05-15 with the following condition: The driveway is brought into conformance by May 1, 2006 by having the new 1. driveway extend all the way back to the new garage and by making the appropriate changes to abide by the setback guidelines. MOTION CARRIED to recommend APPROVAL. 5 Ayes, 0 Nays. Public Hearing:GP05-01Amend the General Development Plan / PUD for Main Street Village Consideration of an amendment to the General Development Plan / PUD for Main Street Village to allow for a change in land uses. Pratt Ordway wishes the City to consider an amendment to the General Development Plan / PUD for Main Street Village to allow the restaurant component of the project to be located in building E and a retail post office component to be located in Building D. This proposal is in conflict with the approved General Development Plan / PUD for Main Street Village. Pratt Ordway would like to modify the approved plan to accommodate a different tenant mix in Building D and E. The developer can no longer precede negotiations with the post office until the PUD is approved. Gary Nordness, Essential Real Estate Services, approached the commission and answered questions from the commissioners regarding the plaza, the square feet of the post office, and the possible draw backs of having a post office located by a restaurant. He reiterated that they would be back before the commission with the finalized plans and that they would be looking for the commissions input on how the post office and plaza area is laid out. O’Keefe asked Fernelius if the post office purchased the land, if it would modify the PUD. Fernelius replied that the PUD decides the use of the land and if the post office decides to purchase the property there would be no change. Mr. Nordes added that as of now the post office has a lease and there is no plan on them purchasing the land. O’Keefe inquired if the post office was using the applicant’s architects. Nordes I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2005\10-18-2005.doc