My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-2006 MINUTES
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Minutes-Board Or Commission PLZ 00900
>
2006
>
04-18-2006 MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 2:12:53 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 2:12:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Approved <br />preparation. She added that this ordinance would affect privately run catering businesses that are <br />utilizing the churches kitchen facilities. O’Brien asked if any food would be consumed at the <br />church. Gundlach replied that the food would be taken off site and not eaten at the church. <br />O’Keefe inquired if there are any other private businesses that are allowed to work out of a <br />church facility. Gundlach replied that she could not find any other similar circumstances. <br />O’Keefe asked if the neighborhood had received any notices regarding the meeting. Gundlach <br />reported that there was a notice in the newspaper, but did not flyer residents within 350 feet, <br />because it is not required for an ordinance change, she did note that the surrounding buildings are <br />almost all business or office with very little residential. Fernelius added that the caterer and the <br />church would have to come before the commission with a special use permit before the use is <br />approved and that would trigger the public hearing notice to residents within 350 feet. O’Keefe <br />stated that commercial uses on commercial properties taxes are collected, and inquired if taxes <br />would be collected for this private business. Fernelius replied that taxes are unrelated to this <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Schiferl stated that he has an issue with the ordinance, because it is allowing a new use in a <br />building that was not approved when they received their original special use permit. Baker <br />replied that the kitchen space would not be dedicated to the caterer, but a shared space with the <br />church and that there are commercial day cares at churches. O’Brien stated that while he shares <br />Schiferl’s concern of permitting an unrelated use, it would be nice to allow a continuous use of a <br />kitchen that is very expensive to put in. Howard replied that he is concerned that this may allow <br />other churches in the city to start catering businesses out of their kitchens and is worried that the <br />ordinance seems to be written for this specific situation. Zisla added that by allowing the caterer <br />they would be allowing a business/commercial use in a residential zone. <br /> <br />Pat MacKenzie, MacKenzie and Friends, Inc, stated that he had a catering business in Eden <br />Prairie that he ran out of a church, but will be relocating to New Brighton this coming fall and <br />would like to relocate his business up here. He added that he did not know the area was zoned <br />residential, because everything around the church is commercial and retail. The food would be <br />prepared at church and would be taken off site, however he would be willing to help prepare food <br />for the church with any events that they have. Baker inquired if he had to pull a special use <br />permit for the church down in Eden Prairie. MacKenzie replied that he did not have to pull a <br />special use permit, but the kitchen had to be licensed and on the license it stated “rental kitchen.” <br />Tim Thompson, Pastor for Atonement Lutheran Church, stated that the Church and Mr. <br />MacKenzie have a wonderful relationship and they are excited to help him with this endeavor. <br />They have not negotiated all the details, but they do plan on him paying rent, and he in turn lets <br />the church donate any extra food that may be left over. <br /> <br />Zisla stated that there has always been a question of intensity of use for schools and churches, <br />however this particular use will have only two employees, and seems consistent with the intended <br />use of this building. Schiferl added that the home occupation is similar and that is allowed in the <br />city. Baker inquired from staff if a homeowner decided to put in a commercial kitchen in their <br />home would they be able to apply for a home occupation and run a catering business out of their <br />home. Gundlach replied that the home occupation standards have a separate set of conditions, but <br />they could host a business out of their house. <br /> <br />Howard re-expressed his concern that this ordinance is written for this specific situation and <br />thinks that it should be more general and he is concerned that by having a two employee <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2006\04-18-2006 MINUTES.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.