Laserfiche WebLink
MERRIAM PARK COMMUNITY COUNCIL, INC. v. McDONOUGH Minn. 417 <br />Cite as 210 1A\' 2d 416 <br />Kenneth J. Fitzpatrick, City Atty., Paul low the required setback of the building <br />F. -McCloskey, Jr., Asst. City Atty., St. from Iglehart Avenue to be reduced from <br />Paul, for City of St. Paul. 35 feet to 16 feet; to permit the construc- <br />tion of 32 living units instead of the 30 - <br />Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and unit maximum allowed on the tract under <br />OTIS, KELLY, and GILLESPIE, JJ. "C" Residence zoning; to permit an in- <br />crease in ground area covered by the build - <br />PER CURIAM. ing from the 35 percent maximum permit- <br />ted under "C"• Residence zoning to 39.7 <br />This is an appeal from a judgment of <br />the district court upholding .the actions of <br />the St. Paul City Council in granting zon- <br />ing code variances to defendant Michael J. <br />McDonough to permit the construction of <br />a 32 -unit apartment building. Plaintiffs, a <br />neighborhood nonprofit corporation and in- <br />dividuals who own property in the immedi- <br />ate vicinity of the proposed site, brought a <br />declaratory judgment action praying that <br />the action of the city council in granting <br />the variances be declared arbitrary, capri- <br />cious, and contrary to law. <br />The district court found in favor of de- <br />fendants. On appeal, plaintiffs contend <br />that defendant McDonough did not make a <br />sufficient showing that "undue hardship," <br />as used in Minn. St. 462.357, would result <br />from the denial of the requested variances. <br />In February 1969, defendant Michael J. <br />;McDonough had acquired a tract of <br />ground at the southeast corner of Prior <br />and Iglehart Avenues in the city of St. <br />Paul in order to demolish the four existing <br />dwellings thereon and erect a 32 -unit <br />apartment building. The tract had a front- <br />age of 225.2 feet on Iglehart and a depth <br />of 141.52 feet south to the alley. The tract <br />was zoned "B" Residence. McDonough <br />applied for, and in March 1969, was grant- <br />ed rezoning to "C" Residence, a classifica- <br />tion permitting the location of a 30: unit <br />apartment building. However, the tract <br />was not large enough to construct a 32 -unit <br />apartment building and leave enough room <br />to conform with setback, buffer area, den- <br />sity, and building coverage requirements <br />prescribed by the St. Paul Zoning Code for <br />a "C" Residence District. Defendant <br />-McDonough applied in February 1969 for <br />variances from the zoning code so as to al - <br />210 N.w.2d-27 <br />percent; and to permit a reduction of re- <br />quired side -yard clearance from 8 feet to 5 <br />feet for the parking lot at the rear of the <br />building. <br />More than a year subsequent to Mc- <br />Donough's application for variances, the <br />city council adopted an amendment to its <br />offstreet parking ordinance, changing the <br />requirement for offstreet parking for mul- <br />tiple residential dwellings from a ratio of 1 <br />offstreet parking space for each residential <br />unit to 1/2 offstreet parking spaces for <br />each. Mr. McDonough then amended his <br />application for variances to seek authoriza- <br />tion for carrying out his original plan of <br />furnishing only 32 offstreet parking <br />spaces. For various reasons, none of <br />which is chargeable to McDonough, the <br />zoning board delayed acting upon his appli- <br />cation for variances for another year, but <br />in July 1971, upon the zoning board's fa- <br />vorable recommendation, the city council <br />granted all the variances requested, finding <br />with respect to the setback variance that if <br />all of the block in which the property is lo- <br />cated had been zoned "C" Residence, the <br />setback requirement would have been <br />slightly over 14 feet, whereas the 35 -foot <br />setback requirement applicable to the sub- <br />ject tract was the result of complying with <br />the ordinance provision which required <br />taking the average setbacks of the homes <br />in the block in existence at the time of the <br />adoption of the zoning code. At the public <br />hearings held on the question of the vari- <br />ances, all parties participated and offered <br />evidence. <br />At the trial of plaintiffs' action, evidence <br />was offered to show that defendant Mc- <br />Donough's cost of land acquisition was ap- <br />proximately $87,000; that without the var- <br />