My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1977-01-19
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1977
>
1977-01-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2007 2:56:21 AM
Creation date
10/31/2007 3:53:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />The Open Meeting Law <br />From the beginning there was conjecture that the open meeting law <br />would lengthen the sessions of governmental bodies. Because in New <br />Brighton's case there are several reasons why meetings have lengthened, <br />there is no way of gauging the impact of the open meeting law here. <br />Recent research conducted by the University of Minnesota provides a good <br />deal of substantiation to the theory that the law does lengthen meetings. <br />Again, however, the Council has little or no control over this phenomena, <br />but simply must respond to it. <br />Increase in Matters Sub-iect to Public Hearing <br />While this factor is directly linked to factors 1, 2, and 4, it <br />deserves separate comment. During the past several years more and more <br />public hearings have been held by the Council. Some of this has <br />occurred because of new ordinance requirements. We believe another major <br />factor is that with an in-house planning staff more actions requiring <br />hearings are "caught" and processed. Regardless of source the public <br />hearings are with us and during the past year directly or indirectly <br />probably consumed close to 50% of the Council's time. Recognizing this <br />fact may be the most critical issue to be faced by the Council and <br />definitely has a major impact on the remainder of this report. <br />Increased Discussion on the Part of Council Members <br />Again from an observer perspective, we see the present Council <br />spending more time than past councils discussing issues. While many of <br />these issues are planning in nature, many are not. The prime difference <br />from the past would not appear to be in questions and answers but rather <br />with each individual Council member frequently stating their respective <br />position on a issue. Of all of the four major factors listed this factor <br />would appear to be the one over which the Council has the greatest <br />control. This is not intended to mean, however, that this practice <br />should be discontinued since the Council may view it as an essential <br />ingredient of the representative process. <br />Goals <br />With the above historical backdrop it would next be useful to state <br />some of the goals we have heard regarding meetings and agendas from <br />various Council and staff members. Those goals are; <br />1. Reduce the length of Council meetings; <br />2. Reduce the lateness of Council meetings; <br />3. Be more responsibe to the members of the public attending <br />meetings (attend to those present before late in the evening); <br />~.~. Provide more time to consider certain agenda items or items <br />there is no time to consider at the present; <br />5. More efficiently and effectively utilize the staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.