My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1976-11-09
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1976
>
1976-11-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2007 2:48:40 AM
Creation date
11/1/2007 4:13:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Proceedings ^,~,~- 3 <br />City of New Brighton !~"~_ <br />Nov. 9, 1976 <br />The Council reviewed the proposed resolution for VN-159. RESOLUTION <br />They took no action regarding the resolution noting VN=159 <br />that it was inappropriate to act on such resolution RCE Corp <br />until more information was submitted by the developer. <br />Public Hearinas <br />The City Clerk stated that he had reviewed the SP-75 <br />hearing notice with the City Attorney atxi found that Clark <br />the hearing was properly called. The Building and Pharmacy <br />Planning Coordinator reviewed-the planning report and <br />Planning Commission recommendations. 9:10 to <br />9;40 <br />Mark Clark, applicant, stated that he would agree with <br />the plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. <br />Councilman Senden asked if one of the options were to <br />move the Clark wall sign down 14 inches. <br />Clark stated that was the intention <br />Councilman Senden asked whether it was the applicant's <br />intent to at sometime move the Clark Pharmacy sign <br />now on the canopy and make it a pylon sign. <br />Clark responded that he had no such plans at this time, <br />Clark further stated that whi~.e the Clark sign would be <br />moved to the facia portion of the canopy, he had long term plans <br />for construction of a larger canopy so that all signs would be <br />totally within the facia of the canopy. He added that he <br />did not want to construct the canopy at this time because <br />it would require moving the Brighton Cleaners Sign. <br />No one spoke in opposition. <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by werdouschegg to close hearing <br />5 ayes- 0 nayes- carried <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by Fisher to direct administration <br />to prepare a resolution in accordance with the Planning <br />Commission recommendations; to place a condition <br />in the resolution that the canopy be built up within <br />5 years or when the Brighton Cleaners sign is changed, <br />whichever is first; and further that drawings of the <br />sign plan be attached to the resolution and be made a part of <br />the resolution <br />5 ayes- 0 nayes- carried <br /> VN-162 <br />The City Clerk stated that he had reviewed the hearing Rodney <br />notice with the City Attorney and found that the hearing Billman <br />was properly called. The Building and Planning <br />Coordinator reviewed the planning report and Planning 9:4i to <br />Commission recommendations. 10:02 <br />Councilman Werdouschegg asked whether the plans <br />included limiting the ground sign in the future to <br />36 square feet. <br />Mayor Bromander pointed out that that was not part of <br />the sign plan but was part of the Planning Commission <br />recommendations.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.