CCP 03-25-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Approved have separate ownership. Mann replied that is a specific type of care that is compatible with the church. Baker stated if the Commission used the objections to the development, which include increased traffic, and preservation of the land and view, no land in the City would ever be developed. Zisla replied that the original proposal did generate quite a bit of discussion by the Commission regarding if this proposal would be in the best interest for the area. He added that when the new proposal was brought forward, some Commission members were concerned that changes had been made that were in conflict with the approved 2005 plan, however the applicant addressed the issues by redesigning parking and increasing the landscape buffer. O'Keefe asked if a condition could be added to limit this development to a six -bed facility. Gundlach replied that condition would be added to the Planned Development Declaration and it could be added under the conditions of the preliminary approval. O'Keefe stated that this is a less intrusive commercial use and believes the size of the facility would not be commercially viable for any other more intensive use. Motion by Baker, second by Schiferl to APPROVE THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND SITE PLAN SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The property is developed in accordance with the submitted Site Plan (revised 2/12/08), Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan, Utility Plan, Landscape Plan (revised), and Electrical Plan. 2. The applicant submits for final Planned Residential Development approval within 90 days of preliminary PRD approval, per Section 7-040 (E). Final PRD approval must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. Minor Subdivision approval is granted only in conjunction with final PRD approval. A separate Resolution will be provided for the Council's adoption. 4. As part of the Minor Subdivision approval the applicant must pay a park dedication fee, amount to be determined by the City Council. 5. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant must provide a copy of an executed and recorded Shared Access and Parking Easement in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney. 6. The applicant adheres to the comments contained in the Interoffice Memo RE Engineering Matters, drafted by Bob Rutherford and dated 1/9/08. 7. A revised Lighting Plan is submitted illustrating compliance with a 0.4 foot-candle maximum at the northerly and easterly lot line. 8. At the time of final PRD approval, the applicant shall submit a Parking Plan illustrating existing, proposed, and proof of parking stalls. a. Building permits will not be issued until final Planned Residential Development and Minor Subdivision approvals have been granted by the City Council. 10. The applicant agrees to enter into a Planned Development Declaration including the conditions noted above and including, but not limited to the following: a. Proof -of -parking is constructed at the discretion of the City. b. The landscaping providing screening at the eastern lot line, abutting 1230 Long Lake Road, is maintained indefinitely. c. The facility shall be limited to 6 licensed nursing beds and 2 rest and study beds only. 6 ayes, 1 nays. Motion Approved.