Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> II I <br /> 'I <br /> II <br /> .(' ~ 'I - r <br /> I, <br /> II <br /> Ii RESOLUTION NO 2241 A <br /> Ii <br /> II ! <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> I CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> ! <br /> i RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND DENYING APPLICATION <br /> II <br /> II FOR VARIANCE APPLICA~ION VN-207 <br /> II WHEREAS, An application for a Variance, VN-207 has been <br /> II made by Donald P. McGinn, 2303 14A Street, to permit the <br /> construction of a duplex with less than the required front <br /> " yard, side street yard, side yard setbacks. <br /> II <br /> II <br /> 11 WHEREAS, The procedural history of the application is as <br /> I! <br /> \1 follows: <br /> II <br /> l. That an application for a variance, VN-207 was <br /> il filed with the City of New Brighton on July 11, 1979. <br /> iI <br /> " 2 . That such application was reviewed by the New <br /> !I Brighton Planning Commission Board of Review on <br /> H July 17, 1979. <br /> 1J <br /> II 3. That the City Council, pursuant to published and <br /> u <br /> I; mailed notices, held a public hearing on August 14, <br /> ;1 1979, all persons's present at the hearing were <br /> I.f <br /> " given an opportunity to be heard. <br /> 'I 4. The written comments and analysis of the City staff, <br /> the Planning Commission minutes and recommendations <br /> II were considered. <br /> L <br /> II NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Brighton City <br /> ii Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to <br /> I, VN-207: <br /> n <br /> " <br /> ., <br /> 11 <br /> 'j <br /> II l. That the lot is zoned R-2, Two Family Residential <br /> :j and the lot has the necessary area and width. <br /> Ii 2. That th~ applicant has presented no warrants for <br /> :t <br /> II the variance in terms of undue hardships or unique <br /> II circumstances and how they apply to the property. <br /> il <br /> iI 3. That a front yard setback of eighteen ( 1 8 ) feet and <br /> II a side street yard of ten (10) feet would result in <br /> II incompatible site lines with adjacent developments <br /> II and would be inconsistent with City policy in regard <br /> '1 <br /> :1 to setback regulations in residential districts. <br /> 'I <br /> II BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. That the application VN-207 <br /> if <br /> p is herebv denied. <br /> !I <br /> iI 28th August <br /> !I Adopted this dav of . 1979. <br /> , <br /> I; <br /> iI <br /> 'I <br /> 'I <br /> I <br /> :i <br /> I <br /> il <br /> '! <br /> I' <br /> d <br /> d <br /> ~ : <br /> 11 <br /> 'I <br /> Ii ATTEST: <br /> ;! <br /> p <br /> 11 <br /> :I ~. ,~.aJ)~, <br /> I) <br /> ;" <br /> n <br /> " <br /> iI Vernon C. Pederson, Clerk <br /> Ii <br /> " <br /> 'i <br /> ,- <br /> Ii <br /> i (SEAL) <br /> .1 <br /> 'i <br /> q <br /> I, <br /> I <br />