Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . , <br />11 . ~... r' , "" <br /> RESOLUTIOM NO. 1065 <br /> STATE OF MINNESO'.l'A <br /> COU:NTY OF RAMSEY <br /> VILLAGE OF NEW BRIGHTON <br />dSOLUTION EXTlBPXNG MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCBOP PERMITS POR <br />'tHE CONS'l'RlJCTIONor SIGNS WITHIN TIlE VILLAGE OF ltEW BRIGHTON <br />waEREASk..olution 1045 adopt~4 february S, 1972, declared <br />a mQratorium on'tb~ t..uanqe'of 1:11gn ~l'mits for 90 days Or <br /> ...., , . ,"" "_ ,"J <br />until the sect.ion of the zoning code X'E!lating 'to signs had been <br />amended anc:leorr-=t.ed" ami <br /> ~~, . '.i, \ <br />WBBR.E1\$ the prOblems outlined iii"1\e'lolutibn 1045 are being <br />act.ivelywo~~.a .onbut>ase not yet reso).V~Cl <br /> '..c'" <br />NOW 'l'BBREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the council of the Village <br />of.., Brl'iht.on as follows <br />1. The moratorium on the issuance of sign permits <br /> i. extended until August 8, 1972 or until t.he <br /> section of the zoning cod. relating t.o.igns has <br /> been amended and correct.ed, whichever shall be <br /> first <br />2. !bat in specific In.tances and upon special <br /> conslderat.ion by the village Council an application <br /> for a sign ,permit may be granted if it can be shown <br /> that. it. ls clearlyauthorlzed by the ordinance and <br /> its authot'!zat.ion does not. fall wit.hin an area of <br /> potential confuslon, misinterpret.at.ion,ar conflict <br /> of the ordinance as it. is now writ.ten, if it is <br /> shown to t.he satiefaat.ion of t.he Council that. a <br /> hardship would exist if such permit were delayed. <br />Adopt-.ed this 25t.h day of April 1972. <br />AftBST: <br />~ ' J: <br /> jJ~e-P~~ c;j~?~t~~ . <br /> Thomall r. Lew 0 , Manager <br />Vernon c. Pederson, Clerk <br />(SIAL) <br />