|
<br />. '~
<br /> " ~, '"
<br /> RESOLUTION NO. 1290
<br /> .........,. ", . .,.". ; $.T)\TE' , OF' :MINNESOTA
<br /> - 1~,., , ~. ,. ." ' ~'.icoiJNTY,io;E' RAMSEY
<br /> VILLAGE OF NEW BRIGHTON
<br />;,.., ", 'f'~ " ~""""''', Ifr.. ~;I "',' ~ ,,~..'. ... : ~. ...~
<br />". .~sOLmho>> }iBiNbONING ~PROPOSEJ1,,:tMPROVEMENT NUMBER 74-4
<br />i-~. ~. :~ "; ~.~ :' ",; ~.".~.,;~.,~, <,~;: L -; .~,. ~, ~~, u. ~ :~'
<br /> ", 'WHE'REA~('propbse'd" impr~vemerit 74~,4cOhsists of the following:
<br /> Improvernept :7.4 -4 '
<br /> Location: 3rd Aven~e S.E. hetween First Street S.lL
<br /> and vacated Clinton Street S.E.
<br /> Improvement By: Acquiring, opening street right of way,
<br /> grading, storm sew~r, concrete curb and
<br /> .Estimated. Cost: gutter, bituminous base and, surfacing
<br /> $27,700~OO
<br /> and
<br /> WHEREAS this proposed improvement has been considered on two
<br /> previous occasions and there are owners Of abutting properties
<br /> that opject to such improvement,and
<br /> WHEREAS the improvement would only serve one improved parcel
<br /> . of land, '
<br /> NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED. AS , FOLLOWS:
<br /> 1. That proposed Improvement 74-4 has an estimated total
<br /> cost .which exceeds the va'1ueof the benefit,s to the
<br /> property such improvement wopld s,erve and benefit;
<br /> 2. That tilie..need of Proposed Improvement. 74-4 as a public
<br /> " improvement is questionable in that it would only serve
<br /> . ' ope parcel of improved prop~rty at the present time and
<br /> matt not be needed to serVe other abutting )1roperty in thE:
<br /> future;
<br /> 3. That Proposed Improvement No. 74-4 be abandoned.
<br /> Adopted ,this 11th day of December, 1973
<br /> .' 'ATTEST: -
<br /> Mayor
<br /> , .' -
<br /> ... ... . . ~... Thomas
<br /> ~'l" . '" ~.//
<br /> Vernon C. Pederson, Clerk~Treasurer
<br /> '. (SEAL)
<br /> '". ,',
<br /> '.. . ~ : .,c' -<-t.4+
<br /> , = ,
<br />"
<br /> .~~ :, t,'" /~~ . \: "~l. :":,~. t . ~' f':"'"f ." ,
<br />
|