Resolution 1585 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

!I I ~ ,I , J' !\ ~ " ~ ... .."" . 6. The written comments and analysis of the city Buildingan'~ Planning coordinator, the Planning I Commission minutes and all statements made by I persons in favor of and opposed to the approval of the applications were considered by the city Council" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the application for SP-6l I be denied and the application for VN-140 be denied for the following reasons some of which are applicable to SP-6l, some of which are applicable to VN-140 and some of which are applicable to both applications: 1. No hardship or unique circumstances applying to the land have been shown. 2. The proposed use of the land demonstrates that the only problem in respect to setback requirements is the proposed use itself and other uses could be placed on the property meeting code requirements. ~ 3. There is no demonstrated justification for reduction of setback requirements, particularly when it is across the street from single and double family residence districts which are developed and used for residential purposes., 4. The proposed use is inconsistent with other uses of land in the immediate area and particularly the adjacent residential uses. 5. The proposed use would be detrimental to the image of the City as it is located at a highly visable point at one of the principal avenues of access to the City from the freeway system. 6. The requested fencing in lieu of curbing would present a continual maintenance and repair problem as evidenced by the admission of the applicant. 7. There is no evidence to support a finding that the proposed special use is essential or desirable to public convenience and welfare or in harmony with the elements or objectives of the master plan in accordance with Section 11-020 of the Zoning Code. 8. The proposed use presents many items which are contrary to the basic purpose and intent of the Zoning Code and are incompatible to the general health, welfare, safety, order and convenience of the City of New Brighton and its citizens. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of August, 1975. ATTEST: , ! i ,.---------...,-'" ~~~i2~ V~>-;_ Vernon C.~Pederson, Clerk-Treasurer (SEAl;.. )