Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> , -:. <br /> , .. <br /> , --- -". <br />~ <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 1583 <br />< <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> I <br /> I CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, ORDERING PREPARATION OF <br /> PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND SETTING DATE OF HEARING <br /> Extract of minutes of the City of New Br~ghton, Minnesota: <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the <br /> City Council of the City of New Brighton, Minnesota was held at <br /> the City Hall in said City on the 22nd day of July, 1975, at 8:00 <br /> p.m. with the following members pr.esent: <br /> Bromander, Anderson, Eagon, Fisher, Rebelein <br /> and the following members absent: <br /> None <br /> Councilman Rebelein introduced the following resolution and <br /> moved its adoption <br /> RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, ORDERING <br /> PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND SETTING DATE OF <br /> HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT 73-2, 3, 4, 5, 6, AND 9 <br /> NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br /> NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA: <br /> 1. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed <br /> is hereby declared to be $487,002.75. <br /> 2. '!'he City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer <br /> shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be i <br /> I specially assessed for such improvement against every i <br /> assessable lot, place or parcel of land within the <br /> district affected, without regard to cash valuation, <br /> as provided by law and shall file a copy of such <br /> proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. <br /> 3. The Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed <br /> assessments notify the Council thereof. <br /> 4. That a public hearing on the proposed assessment be set <br /> for August 14, 1975 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at the City Hall. <br /> 5. That mailed notices of this hearing be sent to each <br /> benefited property owner as required by law. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly <br /> seconded by Councilman Fisher and upon a vote being taken <br /> th~ following members voted in favor thereof: <br /> Bromander, Anderson, Eagop ,'; Fisher, Rebelein <br /> and the following voted against the same: <br /> None <br /> , <br /> ! <br />