Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> ., <br />... ~ <br />~1I.'~.1.1 '" --^-"---- -, --- <br /> --,-.---. ,_. <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 2073 <br /> State of Minnesota <br /> County of Ramsey <br /> city of New Brighton <br /> i RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF THE NORTH 117.9 FEET <br /> ,- <br /> I OF THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 7, SECOND ADDITION TO NEW .BRIGHTON. <br /> I: WHEREA~ ' the City Council has been petitioned to <br /> fi <br /> ,. vacate the north 117.9 feet of the alley in Block 7, <br /> I Second Addition to New Brighton, and <br /> !, <br /> i. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the vacation <br /> ': <br /> Ii proceedings is as follows: <br /> ,i <br /> \, <br /> .' <br /> I, <br /> :1 1. That the three adjacent property owners requested <br /> " the vacation of the above described alley by their <br /> I letter of May 30, 1978. <br /> 1; <br /> " <br /> j: 2. That the Board of Review considered the vacation <br /> -, <br /> " of the alley at their meeting of June 20, 1978. <br /> 3. That the Council pursuant to published notice held <br /> Ii a public hearing on August 8, 1978, to consider <br /> the vacation. All person's present at the hearing <br /> were given an opportunity to be heard. <br /> I[ 4. The written comments and analysis of the City <br /> :1 Planner, the Planning Commission Minutes and <br /> Recommendation and all person's statements made <br /> ;! at the Public Hearing were considered. <br /> ~ : <br /> NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City <br /> of New Brighton following Findings of Fact are made in reagrds <br /> \' to the proposed vacation: <br /> [1 1. That this portion of the alley is not maintained. <br /> i: <br /> I <br /> tl 2. That there are no plans to improve this street. <br /> 3. That there are public utilities located within <br /> the alley. <br /> !i 4. That this port ion of the alley serves no public <br /> purpose. <br /> I <br /> , <br /> Ii 5. That all adjacent property owners have requested <br /> I, <br /> the vacation. <br /> I BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following described alley <br /> !( is and hereby vacated: <br /> , <br /> i[ <br /> I' <br /> I: The north l17.9 feet of the alley in Block 7, Second <br /> Addition to New Brighton, subject to the retention of <br /> ;' utility easement over the entire width of the vacated <br /> alley. <br /> j; <br /> i <br /> ! <br />