08-053 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION NO. 08-053 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE. THE S, an application has been made by Miller Architects & Builders, Inc. on behalf of Inter - Plant ales to permit construction of a 20,787 s.f. warehouse building and associated office and sJ#face parking at 3595 New Brighton Road. IHE S, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1.plication for a Site Plan was received on March 27, 2008 and was deemed incomplete. 2. T applicant was informed, in writing, on April 4, 2008 of a request for additional 3. Allplications for a Vacation, Variance, and Nonconforming Use Permit were received on April 24, 2008. 4. Tie Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on May 20, 2008 and all present were given a chance to freely speak at the hearing. 5. Tk Planning Commission directed the applicant to withdraw the request for a nconforming Use Permit. 6. T Je Planning Commission recommended conditional approval of the Site Plan and Variance of I May 20, 2008. 7. T e applicant submitted written request of withdrawal of the Nonconforming Use Permit. 8. TJe City Council considered the request on May 27, 2008. 1HEREks, the Planning Commission and City Council make the following Findings of Fact with respe to the Site Plan (LP2008-004) and Variance (VN2008-002): 1. e property is zoned I — 1, Light Industrial. 2. T 7 e property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for Light Industrial. 3. e Planning Commission and City Council considered the Site Plan in accordance with I - 1 d Atrict standards of Section 6-030, 6-060, the commercial performance standards of Section 6 90, and the parking standards of Chapter 11 of the Zoning Code. 4. e Planning Commission and City Council found all applicable Site Plan standards to be 5. P fnning Commission and City Council considered the proposed Variance in accordance h Zoning Code Section 8-210. 6. Tde Planning Commission and City Council reviewed the proposal in accordance with the f( lowing crucial points of a Variance noted in Section 8-230: a Undue hardship b , Unique circumstances c' ; Applying to property d Conformance with the comprehensive plan e j Variance shall not be detrimental to adjacent property or the public as a whole. i I:\CO IL\REPORTS\2008\Community Development\5-27-2008\LP2008-004, VA200"02 (Miller Architects on behalf of Inter -Plant) - RESO TION#Ldoc 1