Laserfiche WebLink
BUDGET <br /> POTENTIAL EXPLANATION CURRENT PROBLEMS / ISSUES POLICY CHANGES IMPLICATIONS TIMEFRAME STAKEHOLDERS <br /> AMENDMENT(in bold) (beyond typical staff/city <br /> attorney collaboration) <br /> Site Plan section: trigger Interior remodels do not trigger Inadequate parking becomes problematic over PC & CC would consider Site 45-60 days+ <br /> Mailing to commercial/ Commercial /industrial <br /> for interior remodel Site Plan reviews. Depending on time if interior remodels occur with drastic Plans for interior remodels— industrial building depending on building owners—mainly <br /> impacting 10% of floor area remodel, land use implications parking implications (i.e. warehouse main issue would be determining public <br /> owners. <br /> (%up for discussion) inadvertently result. converted to office). if adequate parking is available. multi-tenant buildings. <br /> sentiment <br /> Many industrial properties have grandfather Regulatory process wouldn't Mailing to industrial <br /> rights with regard to outdoor storage—this property owners. <br /> Provide better conditions under has resulted in virtually no regulation for change (SUP)—amendment 6 months— 1 <br /> which outdoor storage may exist, existing industrial properties with outdoor would have to clarify if existing Additional City Attorney year+ <br /> properties are impacted. Industrial property& <br /> Outdoor storage standards such as allowable amounts, storage. advisement RE who is depending on business owners. <br /> locations, screening,pavement, impacted with the public <br /> drainage, etc. Better defined conditions would give a new If existing properties must amendment—how to sentiment <br /> applicant better assurances in requesting this comply a compliance program establish a compliance <br /> would have to be implemented. <br /> use. program. <br /> Provide a list of expected <br /> standards such as setbacks, Regulatory process and None <br /> screening,parking, exterior Currently staff directs potential applicants to standards wouldn't change. 2-6 months + Business owners with <br /> building materials, etc. —actual numerous sections of the code—amendment depending on <br /> Outdoor dining standards standards imposed wouldn't would allow less guidance with regard to Examine how to handle existing Additional City Attorney public outdoor dining areas <br /> change -merely be consolidated expectations. outdoor dining areas that don't time if Jake's would be sentiment existing or planned. <br /> in the SUP section of the have a SUP (Jake's). impacted. <br /> ordinance. <br /> The existing performance Lack of landscaping standards, unusable 3-6 months + <br /> sound standards, exterior materials not ideal. No policy changes—better Commercial/ industrial <br /> Performance Standards of standards applicable to Potential additional City depending on <br /> pp These issues create some uncertainty at the defined standards to examine as property&business <br /> Section 6-390 commercial &industrial site planning stage in terms of what will be part of the site plan process. Attorney time. public <br /> property are generally outdated. owners. <br /> sentiment <br /> expected for approval. <br /> Consider requiring at least one <br /> enclosed parking stall for single Conversion of garage space to living space. <br /> family residential. Results in more vehicles, garbage cans, etc. Single family homes with <br /> Parking Standards of being stored outside. None—issue would be reviewed no enclosed parking <br /> None 45-60 days aces (staff is aware of <br /> Section 11-030 (3) Provide legislative mechanism during the site planning process. spaces <br /> (other than a variance) to allow Desire to allow less parking without requiring at least 2). <br /> less parking than required by a variance (usually a hardship isn't present). <br /> code <br /> The current ordinances do not address None. This amendment would <br /> PRD/PUD Amendment Provide standards and amendments, only phased developments. Existing PUD &PRD <br /> provide for a defined set of None 45-60 days developments. <br /> procedures procedures for amendments. This becomes problematic—most recent procedures & standards. <br /> p <br /> example is the Clifton House sign request. <br /> 1. Clarify when to plat vs. minor Inconsistent treatment of applicants. Clarification would result in <br /> Subdivision Ordinance: subdivide. better record keeping(clearer Potential additional City Varies—probably limited <br /> minor subdivisions &lot Lot combinations that result in building over legal descriptions) and less Attorney time. 45-60 days interest. <br /> combinations 2. Allowing lot combinations. lot lines. confusion of land ownership. <br />