Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Town of New Brighton Zoning Commission <br />April 16, 1981 <br />Page Three <br /> <br />The Radio Act of 1927 increased the feder<J1 government's authOI^ity to I-eg'. <br />ulate this Cll"ea, and with the passage of the CornmunicaJions Act of 1934, the <br />tn~ncl towards compn~hensive feuu'"lI I-egulation of interstate and foreign com- <br />munication by wire and radio was substantially completed" <br /> <br />The Communications Act of 19311 provided for the establishment of the <br />Fedenll Cornmunication:, Commission to execute (lfld enfon:e the provisions of the <br />Act. The (Joals sou~Jht to be ,lttained by <lcJoption of the Act are clearly staled in <br />Sect iun 1: <br /> <br />Fo,. the pUi'pose of n~qurdting interstelte and fOl-eign commerce in <br />communication by wir-c and radio so ClS to make available, so far as <br />possible, to atl people of the lJnited States iJ rapid, efficient, nation-" <br />wide, cHId wor!d-wide wire and radio communication set"vice . . . and <br />for Uw purpose of securin9 ZI rnor-e effective execution of this policy <br />by centralizing authority hereto ~jranted by laY'1 to sever"al agencies <br />and by granting additional authority with respect to interstate and <br />for-ei~Jn commel^ce in wire and r;Jdio communication. . . 47 U.S.C. ~151. <br /> <br />Additionally, Section 30 I of the Act claims complete jurisdiction over radio <br />ener-gy fOI- the fedenll 90venllllcnt. Section 302 states: <br /> <br />It is the purpose of this Act, among other things, to maintain <br />the control of the United States over all the channels of interstate <br />and fOI^eign I-adio tr-ansmission; and to provide for the use of such <br />channels. . . under licenses granted by Federal authority. . . <br />No person shall use Ot- operate any apparatus for the transmission <br />of energy or communications or signals by radio, . . except under <br />and in acco/-dance with this Act and with a license in that behalf <br />gl^cmted under pr"ovisions of this Act. 47 U.S.C. s301. <br /> <br />Furthermore, Congl"ess granted the Commission the authority to establish a per- <br />vasive system of regulation in the various radio services. Section 303 of the Act <br />~Jives such numerous powel^s to the Commission as to leave no doubt as to the ex- <br />tent of this ,-egulatory scheme. These and other sections of the Communications <br />Act indicate the cleat' intention of Congt'css that radio be ,-egu!atecl by the fed- <br />eral 9overnment" Tile FCC rC<::Julates antenna height in its Rules (Ll7 C. F. R. <br />Section 97.1+5) as docs the FAA, and thus it is not possible for an amateur to <br />erect any size antenna he or she desires. It is not incumbent upon this board to <br />detel'mine characte,-istics pet-twining to antenna height other than to determine <br />the safety of the proposed installation. Nor do the Federal laws authorize such <br />an extension of the scope of that inquil'y beyond safety factors. <br /> <br />It is fully possible to determine prior to installation the safety aspects of an <br />amateur antenna. An electrical or structural engineer has all requisite ability to <br />dete/-mine whether or not an antenna installation is safe. The height of an antenna <br />is not related to the safety of the installation. The relevant factors are the type of <br />anter)Il<1, its placement in the yard, its guyin9 char'acteristics, house bracketing, <br />and the like. All of these factors "H-e fully within the purview of an engineer to <br />analyze. <br />