1980-10-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of New Brighton October 14, 1980 Public Hearings John Daubney, attorney; Sheila Webster, property PUD -2, VN -216, LP -106 manager; and Truman Howell, architect, were Willmus Company present representing the applicant. 7:40 - 8:02 RESOLU'T'ION #2384 Tom Polasckic, area resident, questioned and RESOLUTION #23$5 voiced concern over the proposed usage of the building and questioned the location of the office space. Truman Howell, architect, stated that 10% of the building would be used for office and the remaining 90% would be used for light manufacturing and warehousing. He noted that the office use would be in designated areas and as an example explained that the western portion of "Building A" as designated on the site plan would be used for office space. Joe Boley, 133 13th Avenue SW, questioned noise from truck traffic. Staff noted that the resolution restricted excessive noise and excessive vehicular traffic between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. John Daubney, attorney, noted that to the west of "Building A" as designated on the site plan would be used for automobile parking only and that there is a 60 foot landscape strip with numerous plantings to buffer the development from the adjacent residential properties. Burt Emerson, 45 12th Avenue NW, stated that he felt the plans were of a good design and that this type of development would be compatible with the adjacent residential properties due to the architectural design. Motion by Schmidt, seconded by Blomquist to close the hearing. 5 ayes - 0 nayes - motion carried Motion by Janecek, seconded by Benke to waive the reading and adopt a RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE APPLICATION VN --216. 5 ayes - 0 nayes - motion carried Motion by Blomquist, seconded by Janecek to waive the reading and adopt a RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PUD -2. 5 ayes - 0 nayes - motion carried -2-