Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-:-:r:""'~ <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />What Are the Consequences? <br /> <br />TIH:se are but a kw of the sources of the problem. <br />Now let's take a look at some of the results. Here <br />agi;\in, many of the consequences of ineth:ctivt:: pulice <br />management can be fuund in nearly every other <br />organization, whctherin the public or the private <br />sector. These are some of the more cummon pitfalls <br />of police managers. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. Open Door, Closed Mind. Even though the chief <br />may practice an "open door" policy, he may not be <br />interested in, or capable of, listening to and under- <br />standing other people's problems. A common com- <br />plaint among police subordinates is that "the chief <br />listens but he docsn't hear." The !llcn and women <br />employed in the police service today are more intel- <br />ligent and enlightened than their predecessors. They <br />are not willing to accept a management style based <br />on paternalism and custom. <br /> <br />. Failure to Prioritize. A police chief executive's time <br />is limited. and his responsibilities are many. FeW <br />pol ice chiefs can afford the luxury of a 40-hour week, <br />at least not until they have managed to get their de. <br />partlnents operating smoothly. Consequently, chiefs <br />must learn to allocate their time wisely and to get the <br />most prcssing matters out of the way before tackling <br />less important problems. In essence, they must learn <br />to manage their time wisely. <br /> <br />. Failure to Delegate. Too many chiefs try to do <br />everything themselves, and as a result many details <br />are allowed to "fall through the cracks." Chiefs must <br />develop confidence in their mid.level managers and <br />\lIust allow them suflicient latitude and authority to <br />accomplish specific objectives. This will not only <br />give the chief more time 10 attend to top-level issues, <br />but it will help to develor the capabilities of sub- <br />ordinates and better prerare them for advancement <br />in the future. <br /> <br />How to Evaluate your Chief <br /> <br />There arc, of course, other weaknesses commonly <br />exhibited by chiefs of police. In some cases, however, <br />these weaknesses may remain beneath the surfacc for <br />a long pcriod of time until a single event or series of <br />events brings them to your attention. By this time, <br />a crisis may have devdoped that requires immediate <br />and drastic action. To forestall such an occurrence, <br />here are several questions you may wish to ask your. <br />sel[ in assessing the competence of your police chief. <br /> <br />If your chief is within the "rest easy" category, you <br />can afford to devote YOUl attention to some other <br />area within city government. The other categories are <br />self-explanatory. If you don't know enough about the <br />police chief to answer th~se questions yourself, you <br />may already have a problem without realizing it! <br /> <br />Almost Once in Almost <br />Always Awhile Never <br />rn [2] C1l <br />m rn rn <br />rn g] [3J <br />m [I] [] <br />OJ [I] DJ <br />[}J [2J [ll <br />CD [2J C1l <br />rn rn rn <br />OJ 111 {] <br />CD [Z] CD <br /> <br />Does the chief: <br /> <br />Keep you fully appraised of current problems and issues? <br />Consult with subordinates in policy matters? <br />Encourage staff participation in planning and budget? <br />Set a good example in tcnns of cunduct and personal appearance? <br />Welcome and encourage new ideas and suggestions? <br />Encourage high stamhu"ds of performance through written and <br />oral commendations? <br />Take an ,-Ictive role in community affairs? <br />Face advcl"sity calmly and objectively? <br />Delegate authority to subordinates commensurate with <br />their responsibility and ability? <br />Seek to improve the management and administrative <br />capabilities of subordinates? <br /> <br />SCORING: 10-15 Rest Easy <br />16-20 Be Careful <br />21-25 Vh Oh! <br />26-30 Crisis Ahead! <br /> <br /> 1. <br /> 2. <br /> 3. <br /> 4. <br /> 5. <br /> 6. <br /> 7. <br />I 8. <br />9. <br />10. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Pul ,lie Management/December 1979 <br />