My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1979-09-25
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1979
>
1979-09-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2005 5:24:33 PM
Creation date
9/14/2005 2:49:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />:~' <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />......iI <br /> <br />~ <br />~~/ZJ(14 <br />~ <br />~~t <br /> <br />1001 - 'rd St., N. W. <br />New Brighton, MN 55112 <br /> <br />September 13, 1979 <br /> <br />Mr. Vernon C. Pederson, Clerk/Manager <br />City of New Brighton <br />803 - 5th Av., N. W. <br />New Brighton, Mn 55112 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Pederson: <br /> <br />Every fall and winter, numerous New Brighton teenagers -and some adults-- <br />brave the harsh weather to check their muskrat traplines and eash in on one of <br />Minnesota's abundant and renewable natural resources. In so doing, these hardy <br />youngsters are following one of the oldest traditions in the North Country, the <br />fur-gathering tradition on which this state was founded. But next winter they <br />cannot. <br /> <br />I have just learned that last February the City of New Brighton passed <br />Ordinance No. 445, "Prohibiting the Use of Certain Traps within the City of <br />New Brighton." I would like to ask the City Council to repeal that ordinance. <br /> <br />At first glance, the ordinance might appear to have merit. Because <br />many people no longer trap furbearing animals, a focus on the tools of the <br />trade might persuade the public to ban them. Similarly, if most people did <br />not fish, a focus on the barbed hook might persuade the public to ban that <br />device. But since most people do fish, and thus utilize the barbed hook with- <br />out compunction, there 60 far have been no viable movements to outlaw the use <br />of the barbed hook in New Brighton. <br /> <br />No person when confronted with a barbed hook, a trap, an expanding bullet, <br />or a razor-edged arrowhead is going to look favorably upon those instruments <br />unless he or she is familiar with the context in which they are used, and the <br />reasons why they must be employed. <br /> <br />Some citizens feel that there is no reason that can justify the use of these <br />instruments --or any others-- to kill fish and wildlife. Such people have chosen <br />the steel trap as the first instrument they wish to outlaw because the general <br />public is least familiar with trapping and thus most easily persuaded against it. <br /> <br />However, when seen in context, trapping is merely one more way in which <br />humans harvest wildlife for sport and profit and help to control populations that <br />may be destructive to man's interests. Within l/S mile of City Hall, many teenagers <br />have peacefully spent numerous exciting hours checking their traps and earning <br />hundreds of dollars every year, to the harm of absolutely no one. The only effect <br />these trappers have had is to reduce the numbers of muskrats that freeze to death, <br />get flattened on the roads each spring, or that undermine the banks of the property <br />owners on Long Lake and other area waterways. Professional ecologists will attest <br />to this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.