My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-19-2009
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
PC Packets
>
2009
>
05-19-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2021 7:51:07 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:47:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
calculated that the existing ground floor area of all structures in the PRD is 18%. With the <br /> proposed 1,200 SF expansion, the total ground floor area of the entire PRD would remain at <br /> 18%. These number are as follows: <br /> Existing: 124,441 SF (ground floor area)/682,061 SF (lot area) = 18.2% <br /> Proposed: 125,641 SF (ground floor area)/682,061 SF (lot area) = 18.4% <br /> Staff finds the proposed expansion to remain in compliance with ground floor area limitation of <br /> Section 7-060 (6). <br /> Exterior Building Materials <br /> The proposed addition will be constructed with exterior materials that match the existing <br /> building. Those materials consist of grey wood lap siding, painted hardboard panels, and teal <br /> colored flashing and accent trim. <br /> Public Works/Engineering <br /> As part of the overall project, the applicant is adding approximately 300 SF of additional hard <br /> surface. This additional hard surface requires that the applicant provide for on-site treatment. <br /> As shown on Proposed Drainage Conditions Plan and the Grading & Erosion Control Plan, the <br /> applicant has proposed as expansion to the existing infiltration basin. This expansion occurs at <br /> the southeast corner of the existing infiltration area located at the northwest corner of the site. <br /> The total area of the expansion is 149 CF. The applicant has submitted an application to the Rice <br /> Creek Watershed District, who will consider the request at a meeting to be held on May 27th <br /> The City Engineer reviewed the proposed civil plans and finds them acceptable. <br /> Mechanical Concerns <br /> As a result of the neighborhood meeting, concerns were expressed regarding the amount of noise <br /> generated by the mechanical units on site in the courtyard area of the existing building. There <br /> are numerous units, however staff observed that at least two seem to generate the most amount of <br /> noise: 1) a condenser unit to the north of the small kitchen bump-out (labeled ACC-3), and 2) a <br /> unit that vents out the western wall of the small kitchen bump-out (labeled Magi-Pak). There are <br /> three other mechanical units within this courtyard area. <br /> The applicant has submitted a plan that includes relocation, removal, or replacement of all the <br /> units. This plan indicates that the larger unit to the north of the kitchen bump-out (ACC-3) and <br /> the unit that vents out the western wall of the kitchen bump-out (Magic-Pak) will be removed. <br /> However, two smaller units will be placed to the north of the kitchen bump-out (ACC-6 &ACC- <br /> 4) and another unit will be relocated farther west (ACC-1). The applicant's written email that <br /> accompanied the Mechanical Plan indicates the new mechanical equipment will be quieter and <br /> noise will be reduced by half. The Mechanical Plan also indicates a 5' high solid screen wall <br /> will be built to block noise generated by the units labeled (ACC-6 &ACC-4). <br /> While staff is encouraged by the removal of four of the existing units,three units will still remain <br /> in the courtyard area having the potential to create noise deemed unreasonable by the neighbors. <br /> Staff would recommend the applicant be advised to relocate all mechanical equipment to either <br /> the east end of the building or to the underground parking garage. The Commission should <br /> discuss this issue to determine what is appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.