Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br />RESOLUTION NO <br />09-040 <br />;SOLUTION AUTHORIZING TERMINATION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE <br />REDEVELOPMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON AND <br />:RMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. REGARDING PROPERTY REFERRED TO AS THE <br />tMER LONG LAKE LANDINGS DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE NORTHWEST <br />QUADRANT <br />WHEREAS, the City of New Brighton and Sherman Associates, Inc. ("Sherman") were <br />parts to a redevelopment agreement dated June 22, 2004 for redevelopment of area referred to <br />as tba former Long Lake Landings within the Northwest Quadrant. That original agreement was <br />replaced by an "amended and restated" contract executed by the parties on December 13, 2005 <br />for rhUevelopment of the area depicted on Exhibit A ("Property"); <br />WHEREAS, the December 13, 2005 contract was the subject of a "First Amendment" <br />eXCC L ted by the parties on August 22, 2006, which altered dates and the scope of the project due <br />to changed circumstances but left many of the operative provisions in place. Together, the <br />December 13, 2005 and August 22, 2006 contracts form the City's complete agreement with <br />She an and establish the parameters of the relationship ("Agreement") with respect to the <br />WHEREAS, on April 23, 2009 the City Council adopted Resolution 09-025, authorizing <br />give notice of default to Sherman as provided in the Agreement; and <br />� 1 WHEREAS, that written notice of default was sent by certified mail dated May 18, 2009 <br />to S rman as required by the Agreement; and <br />WHEREAS, the notice of default informed Sherman that the City had met all of its <br />obli tions under the Agreement and that Sherman had thirty days to cure its default or provide <br />written assurances acceptable to the City that a cure was forthcoming shortly, pursuant to the <br />Aur ent; and <br />in <br />WHEREAS, Sherman acknowledged receipt of the notice of default in a responsive letter <br />May 29, 2009 in which Sherman indicated a belief that, due to significant environmental <br />on the site, the City had not complied with its obligations under the Agreement, resulting <br />,rman's failure to proceed, but did not cure the default or provide assurances of <br />mance as required under the Agreement to cure the default and as of the date of this <br />tion has not cured or offered assurance of performance; <br />