Laserfiche WebLink
Of <br />W r.:idy° that w)rkis t(w ynu <br />Memo <br />To: Mayor and City Council <br />From: Dean R. Lotter, City Manager <br />Subject: Budget 2010 Worksession <br />Date: September 4, 2009 for September 8, 2009 <br />Tax Impact Scenarios <br />As you will recall from our last budget worksession, I suggested sending out scenario <br />information in the Friday memo and then having Council respond in advance of the <br />Tuesday September 81h meeting. There were three tax levy scenarios discussed in the first <br />two worksessions. The first scenario (a 7.53% tax levy scenario) was rejected by Council. <br />Discussion over the other two scenarios (2.02% or 0%) focused on the impacts of filling <br />or not filling specific positions. Attached is a new tax impacts spreadsheet that isolates <br />the Deputy Director, Senior Engineering Tech and Forester position. Please notice the <br />titles of the positions, the annual costs of the position (these staffing costs have been <br />increased slightly over the amounts used in our first two budget worksessions because <br />they now include workmen's comp costs) and the tax impact in terms of dollars for filling <br />each position to the median valued house. Essentially the cost for filling the Deputy <br />Director is $11 for the year. Filling the senior engineering tech position will cost $8 per <br />year and the Forester costs $6 for the year. The numbers are in the context of a median <br />valued home. There are additional scenarios included for a $200,000, $400,000 and <br />$600,000 home. All home value scenarios show their values reduced by 5.36% from <br />2009 to 2010 which is a number given to us by Ramsey County. <br />As mentioned previously, the Council must adopt a preliminary levy and budget on <br />September 8th to certify to the County by September 15th. A scenario was created that <br />takes the 2.02% levy and levies an additional $73,600 to provide funding for the vacant <br />positions to be filled January 1, 2010. The impacts of this levy are included in the <br />attached spreadsheet. This scenario is the one included in the regular meeting packet for <br />adoption. As stated before this number is a maximum levy after it is certified to the <br />County. There are dates on the calendar to continue discussing the budget over the next <br />few months with a final adoption in December 2010. The October discussion will cover <br />H-\Correspondcncc\City Ceuncil\Budget Worksession Discussions Early 2009\Bu4,et 2010 September S. 2009.doc <br />