My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-09-2010
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2010
>
CCP 03-09-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 9:33:38 PM
Creation date
3/5/2010 1:02:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II&OfOf <br />BRKIfTON <br />the city that works for you <br />Report Number <br />Agenda Section <br />Council Meeting Date <br />• REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION <br />10-056 <br />VI -3 <br />March 9, 2010 <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION: Authorization for the Mayor and City Manager to enter in an Addendum to <br />the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of New Brighton and Bell Pole concerning <br />chemical change -out practices. <br />DEPARTMENT HEAD'S APPROVAL: Grant Fernelius, Community Development Director <br />GW <br />CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL: <br />No comments to supplement this re ort Comments attached <br />Recommendation: Authorize the Mayo City Manager to sign the attached addendum to <br />Memorandum of Understanding between #iefity and Bell Pole. <br />Legislative History: November 13, 2007: The City Council authorized the Mayor and City Manager to <br />enter in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and Bell Pole. The purpose of the <br />MOU was to address odor concerns for the property while recognizing the property held a certain level <br />of grandfather rights to emit odor. The MOU established a base line odor threshold not to exceed 1.2 <br />odor units at the property line. Under the MOU the company agreed to notify the City if a change in <br />operation resulted in an increase above 1.2 odor units. 1.2 odor units was chosen because the company <br />had the technical ability to meet it and it was considered very low and undetectable by most people <br />under normal weather conditions. <br />• April 14, 2009: The City Council held a work session to discuss the numerous odor complaints that had <br />been received beginning in mid-February 2009. Through investigation it was determined the odors were <br />coming from the Bell Pole facility located at 778 ls` Street NW. Upon inquiry City staff was notified by <br />Bell Pole employees that a new chemical was introduced, which was ultimately responsible for the <br />odors. <br />Financial Impact: None <br />Explanation: Since the spring of 2009 City staff, Bell Pole staff, and their respective legal counsels <br />have been working on completing an addendum to the MOU that was originally executed in November <br />of 2007. The purpose of the addendum was to address procedures the company must follow with regard <br />to pole treating operations and chemical use to ensure the company complies with the 1.2 odor unit <br />threshold. The addendum (which was prepared by the City Attorney) is attached for review and has <br />been signed by Bell Pole President Thomas Bell. <br />As Bell Pole began to investigate the reasons for the odor event of early 2009, it was discovered that <br />Bell Pole was shipped a chemical materially different from what they had preliminarily tested as being <br />within the 1.2 odor unit threshold. One of the main points in the attached addendum is that Bell Pole <br />must collect a sample of the shipped product prior to initial use and conduct tests to ensure it is <br />consistent with what they previously tested. The addendum also clarifies other testing procedures to <br />ensure another odor event doesn't occur. Staff recommends execution of two copies of the addendum. <br />• Costs and Funding: Not applicable <br />Janice Gundlach <br />Citv Planner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.