My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-20-2010
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
PC Packets
>
2010
>
2010
>
04-20-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2018 4:55:36 PM
Creation date
4/15/2010 3:58:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sxnoo 1"60. cenernl Flood Plain District and zone A Lakes. <br />(1) Remicethe ikeas <br />A. The uses listed in Section 10-040 (I) of this Chapter shall be permitted uses. <br />B. All other uses shall be subject to the 1% wind cbanre Flood 000 -Year Flood Elevations <br />and/or Fleodway/Flood blame deMrmwmions evichro weriteria pursuant to Senior I Map (2) <br />and Section 10-060 (3) below. Section 10 -NO shell apply if Me proposed use is or the Floodway, <br />District and Section 10-050 shell apply if Me proposed use is in the Flood Fringe District. <br />(2)lYo[edaresf 1%urm al chance /bad(104,Fear HoodE(eumions) ondw Ffoodway wdElood <br />Fe6sge Dere:mina(ions fw Streams Lo[med Within Me CenmW FIOM Plain LlsrrkG <br />A. Upon receipt man application for ae Q i3lse permitiamma or eravorovalwithin <br />Me General Flood Plain District, Me applicant shall be required b famish such ofthe following <br />information as is deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator for the determination of Me <br />Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation and whether Me proposed use is within Me Floodway or <br />Flood Fringe District. <br />1. A typical valley cross-sections) showing the channel of the stream, elevation of land <br />neem adjoining each side of the channel, cross-swimml sass In be occupied by Me <br />proposed development, and high water information. <br />2. Plan (surface view) showing elevations orce mems of the ground; pertinent structure, <br />fill, or smmge elevations; size, location, and spatial commitment of all proposed and <br />existing structures on Me site; location and elevations of slree6; photographs showing <br />existing land uses and vegetation upstream and downstream: and coil We. <br />3. Profile showing Me slope of the botmm of Ne channel or Flaw line of the strand for at <br />hard 500 feet in either direction from the proposed development. <br />B. The applicant shall submit a copy ofthe information required by Section IM60 (2) A W a <br />designated engineer or other expert person oragency for technical assistance in doff mining Me <br />1% annual chanceflood (I 00-YFlood El )'f not available,whetter Me proposed use <br />is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe District and to determine the Regulatory Flood Protection <br />Elevation. Procedures consistent with Minnesota Regulations 1983, Parts 6120.500-6120.6200 <br />and 44 Code of Federal Regulations Part 65 shall he followed in this expert evolution. The <br />designated engineer or expert is strongly encouraged m discuss Me proposed twelve] evaluation <br />methodology, with the respective Department of Natural Resources' Area Hydrologist prior to <br />commencing the analysis. Thedesignatederegincer espertsball: <br />d Estimate the peak discharge of me regional Mind. <br />2. Calculate the water surf eProfile of Me regional Flood based upon hydraulic analysis <br />of Me stream charnel and ovnbank ares. <br />3. Compute the Floodway necessary to convey or sure the regimml Rood without <br />increasing flootl stages more dun 0.5 foot A lesser stage increase than 0-5 foot shall be <br />required if, as a result of Me additional stage increase, increased Bond damage would <br />result An equnl degree ofmismaclunent on hath side ofthe stream within Me reach shell <br />be assumed in computing Mensway boundaries. <br />C. The Zoning Administrator shut[ present Me technical evaluation and Failings of Me designated <br />engineer misspent to the City Council. The City Council most formally accept the technical <br />evnlemion and Me recommended Floodway and/or Flood Fringe District boundary or deny the <br />(Underline reflects new language, Sirsk it s -us relecu deleted language) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.