My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 07-27-2010
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2010
>
CCP 07-27-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:35:09 PM
Creation date
7/23/2010 2:11:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Commissioner Schifed questioned tae stress point to the accessory building. Ms. Guudlech reported <br />there are two overhead doors, and two service doors; there is not a driveway. Commission« Danger <br />reported dle pmperty is landlocked, and would be very difficult to get vehicle m the accesrory building, <br />and expressed coacem if the current agreement between neighbors ceased. <br />Joe Alexander (representing the applicam) reported he has the same issue, and often owes his neighbor's <br />yard for access. Commissioner Danger rated the proposed building is larger them some of the Mmes in <br />the bass. <br />Ms. Gino tach stated the zoning code does rot require access by vehicle form accessory, building. <br />Commissioner Danger questioned why consideration would be given as such a large structure if a vehicle <br />wouldn't M stored there. Mr. Alexander surd the applicant does not intend In scare vehicles in the <br />accessory building; primarily boats, ATVs, waverumers and other n,. eeBamons items. <br />Chan Howard opened the Public Hearing at 7:22 <br />Grant Johnson residing at 1883 IS" Ave. mend he really wasn't for or against the project, and warted m <br />sheer the Neighbodreod Asmci don Covin t. City Plainer Gandlazh explained the City does not get <br />involved with private covenants. <br />Commissioner Shiferl mgges[ed tabling the them until a time when the applicant could be present. <br />Commissio= Zisla stated be could not tell if the covering wan suit valid. Commissioner Danger <br />expressed his comem that the project could have a negative impact on adjarem properties because of the <br />Jorge see (17 feet high at the peak.) <br />Commissovm McPherson questioned what other questions the commission might have for the applicant <br />if he were present, Commissioner Scldfl sound he would the clarification on intended uses. <br />• Chun Howard questioned the implications of tabling the ahem. Ms. GuMlach replied the 60 day role <br />would apply, and was fairly roman [here would be no problems tabling the request mrd the July 20's <br />massing. In the event the 60 day role was rot mel Ms. Gurdlach would have the ability in extend the <br />deadline. Mr. Alexander pushed out teat the Van Der Wal's leave a very large lot and the proposed <br />accessarry building proportionally is appropriate. <br />Commissioner Zisla stated he is in favor of tabling the item in order to address the applomt. <br />Motion by Commissioner Schifd, screamed by Commissioner Zisle m bible the item for one month for <br />purposes of having the applicant present a ted morning m discuss the need for the size of the structure. <br />Approved 7-0 <br />Other Items: <br />City Phmner Gundlach reported City Staff is seeking direction fear the Commit on the Be] An <br />Excavating issue, and is hopeful the Planing Commission will sen something in the next couple of <br />mongbs. Commissioner delayed questioned the City of Moods View's thoughts on the item. Ms. <br />Gmadlsch reported the City of Mounds View has not been involved in the discussions, and my future <br />requests would require a Public Hearing, resulting in a notification of Msime; owners whom 350 Ice4 <br />which would include some Wsinesses located in Mountie View. <br />Adjournment: 8:34 PM <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.