My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WS 08-24-2010
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2010
>
2010 Council Work Session Materials
>
WS 08-24-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 7:44:13 PM
Creation date
8/20/2010 4:15:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: August 20, 2010 <br />TO: Dean Lotter, City Manager <br />Schawn Johnson, Assistant to the City Manager <br />FROM: Grant Fernelius, Community Development Director C -4R,- <br />SUBJECT: Work Session Update on Stuart Company Negotiations <br />Staff met with representatives from Stuart Companies on August 16th to discuss their <br />proposal for an apartment project in the Northwest Quadrant. The negotiations <br />continued with a counter proposal from Stuart Companies on August 18th. All of these <br />deal points are subject to Council review, but the following is a summary of the <br />negotiations. <br />Densi <br />Stuart is proposing to reduce the project scope from 125 to 120 units. We have not <br />been able to understand why there was a reduction. While disappointing, it represents <br />a 4% reduction. <br />Reaction: The proposed project still has a density of 30 units per acre, which is <br />consistent with the City's goals. <br />Cash Assistance <br />Stuart has affirmed that they need $1.5M in net cash assistance to make the project <br />work. They have identified an 8% rate of return (before tax cash flow/cash equity) as <br />their minimum threshold. Some of the other developers we talked to identified a much <br />higher minimum rate of return, (10-12%), so Stuart's projection is low for the industry. <br />Stuart is contributing slightly more than $4,000,000 (22%) toward the project and has <br />stated that they will not put more cash or debt into the project. All things being equal <br />this would simply reduce their proposed the rate of return. There is a $300,000 gap <br />between what the City can provide ($1.2M) and Stuart's request ($1.5M). They <br />recognize that the City does not have more cash, so they are proposing to adjust the <br />land price (see below). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.