Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />New Brighton Economic Development Commission Approved <br />Regular Meeting —August 17, 2010 <br />• 7:30 a.m. <br />Members/Liaisons Present: Gina Bauman, David Phillips, Mark Nelson, Dennis Flahave, Marie <br />Hansen, Bob Berke, Bob Smith, Ruben Vasquez and Mike Murlowski <br />Members/Liaisons Absent: Terri Snell and D.L. Beach <br />Staff Present: Grant Fernelius, Community Development Director; Katie Bruno, Office Assistant. <br />Call to Order <br />Commissioner Nelson called the meeting to order. <br />Approval of Minutes <br />Minutes from the June 15, 2010 meeting will be submitted for approval at the 9-21, 2010 meeting. <br />Report from Council Liaison <br />Councilmember Bauman reported the Council has been working on the budget and will be <br />recommending a 0% levy for 2011, with maintaining service levels in the City. <br />Northwest Quadrant Report <br />Developer Discussion <br />Director of Community Development Fernelius reported the City has been meeting with about 6 <br />developers over the past 18 months; the greatest interest has been in the residential market. <br />• A brief explanation was provided for each of the following developers, TOLD, United Properties, <br />Dunbar Development, Dominium, Ecumen and Stuart Companies. Some of the developers expressed <br />concern with the gap in rents. The Senior Cooperative market has slowed down significantly, due to the <br />decrease in sales of single family homes. Stuart Companies has expressed the most interest, they have <br />prepared a proposal for a 125 unit market -rate building on Block H. The plan shows a 4 story building <br />with underground parking. The current "L" shaped building design would require additional land in the <br />adjacent greenway area (approximately 8,800 SF). The developer has indicated if they were selected for <br />the project by early to mid-August, they could break ground in 2011. The developer is requesting $1.5 <br />million of assistance to make the project work. The pro forma identifies a $500,000 land payment <br />($4,000 per unit) and a TIF assistance of $2.0 million. The City does not have $1.5 million of TIF cash <br />available, so if there is interest in negotiating with Stuart Company, this amount would have to be <br />reduced. This assumes, of course, that the City is willing assist the development at all. <br />The City may also need to consider modifications to its NWQ Code to accommodate the project if <br />modifications cannot be made. <br />The City Council directed staff to continue the negotiations with Stuart Companies. It is anticipated that <br />a counter proposal will be made by the City. The Council's desire to "fast track" a project is primarily <br />based on the on-time opportunity to use Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district cash reserves that are not <br />needed for debt service. <br />Fernelius stated the City could wait for a better deal in a couple of years. However, the value of the <br />current proposal and the associated tax increment should be considered ($167,000 to $191,000 per year) <br />depending on the value of the project. A second variable is the land price. Concessions made on land <br />price can be recouped if development happens in a more timely fashion. <br />. Commissioner Murlowski and Smith expressed concern with selling parcel H for such a low price. <br />Fernelius agreed, and expressed concern with setting values too low for future potential land values, but <br />also noted land values have been on the decrease. <br />Councilmember Bauman expressed concern that there is not retail in the development area, and may <br />make it difficult to occupy the property. Commission Benke suggested often convenience retail follows <br />development. <br />