My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-09-2010
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2010
>
CCP 11-09-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2010 3:28:21 PM
Creation date
11/5/2010 4:03:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 26 , 2010 Page 3 of 5 <br />at 2200 Old Highway 8 NW. Details of the overlay address noise limitations, odor and dust <br />mitigation, blowing debris, screening, maximum pile heights, as well as a time limit in which <br />yard waste can be can be stored on the premise. <br />The special use permit would permit the crushing of aggregate material. The primary concern <br />is related to the piles of material on the site, as well as noise; specifically tailgate banging. A <br />berm is proposed to address both issues. The applicant initiated a noise study, details of the <br />study were shared; it does indicate that the berm would reduce noise substantially. <br />Two site lines were prepared; from Rockstone Court and from Mississippi Street, currently <br />there is a clear view to the rubble pile, the proposed berm is expected to screen the rubble <br />pile from both locations. <br />The yard waste transfer use is a new concept. The use would allow yard waste haulers to <br />dump material on site for a period not to exceed 24 hours. The primary concerns include; odor, <br />truck noise, the volume of the material, the length of time the material would be on site, <br />and the possibility of blowing debris. <br />The Site Plan analysis was reviewed. A neighborhood meeting was held, where eleven <br />interested people attended. The following concerns were expressed: noise, esthetics of the <br />berm, construction details of the berm, contingency plan for the daily removal of the yard waste, <br />and the City's ability to perform inspections in order to ensure compliance. <br />The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at both the September 21 and October 19th <br />meetings. The commission recommended adoption of the overlay and the two special use <br />permits. The applicant requested three years to complete the berm; the Planning <br />Commssion recommended a two year time line, as well as a landscaping requirement. <br />Staff recommended the following: <br />• Adopt the ordinance establishing an Environmental Constraint Overlay Area. <br />• Adopt the attached Resolution approving a Special- Use Permit allowing for an ag <br />crushing/recycling operation subject to 9 conditions <br />• Adopt the attached Resolution approving a Special Use Permit allowing for a yard <br />transfer facility, subject to 11 conditions as outlined. <br />Motion by Councilmember Phillips, seconded by Councilmember Burg to approve the ordinance <br />establishing an Environmental Constraint Overlay Area as recommended by the Planning Commission. <br />5 Ayes, 0 Nays, Motion Carried <br />Councilmember Phillips acknowledged the many hours the Planning Commission spent <br />discussing the items, and expressed his gratitude to the Commission for their input. <br />Councilmember Phillips suggested condition number 4 of the aggregate crushing resolution, and <br />condition number 5 of the yard waste transfer site resolution include the requirement that the <br />planting material meet MNDOT standards. In addition the specific requirement of evergreen <br />and deciduous trees be changed to sumac if applicable, in addition to any other MNDOT <br />standard. <br />Councilmember Burg questioned how the berm will be constructed to prevent sliding; as it is <br />very steep. Mr. Michael Murlowski responded that all erosion control measures will be in place <br />during the construction process. <br />Councilmember Phillips questioned the applicant, if three years were granted to build the berm, <br />would you complete the project in two years if at all possible? Mr. Murlowski confirmed this <br />request. <br />Councilmember Phillips suggested authorizing one annual inspection, unless three complaints
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.