My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WS 11-15-2010
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2010
>
2010 Council Work Session Materials
>
WS 11-15-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2010 4:04:24 PM
Creation date
11/12/2010 4:04:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo <br />To: Mayor and City Council <br />From: Dean R. Lotter, City Manager <br />Subject: 2011 Budget Proposal <br />Date: August 11, 2010 <br />Executive Summary <br />In 2008 and 2009, the legislature imposed levy limits and started reducing <br />intergovernmental aid to cities. While New Brighton was scheduled to receive $152,000 <br />in aid; it was cut by the State of Minnesota before the City ever received it. Market Value <br />Homestead Credit was reduced as well and New Brighton has lost all MVHC aid. In late <br />2009, the Council adopted a budget with a 0% tax levy. Shortly into the new year, <br />Council directed staff to do additional work on forecasting the General Operating Fund <br />for 2011. The forecasting exercise that staff engaged in resulted in a budget amendment <br />which was adopted in April 2010. This amendment reduced the City's use of reserves as <br />a revenue source and adjusted several expenditure line-items. Staff has been working on <br />the City Budget for 2011 with the goal of proposing a 0% tax levy that also does not rely <br />on any use of reserves. <br />Zero Tax Levy - Operating Budget <br />Numerous efforts have been made to prepare for a zero percent and no dollar increase in <br />the tax levy. Very conservative union contracts were negotiated. While the Teamsters <br />contract expires in December of 2010, I anticipate negotiations will be relatively easy due <br />to two of three union contracts are already settled. Staffing positions that were not filled <br />in 2010 remain unfilled in 2011 and the public safety budget will have money for 27 <br />officers not 28. Staff also made adjustments to IT internal charges due to better <br />management of existing dollars and better long-range planning of IT assets. The general <br />budget attached to this packet is a draft and still shows a $32,800 deficit. I would <br />recommend freezing non-union steps, but allowing a 2% increase in pay commensurate <br />with the union agreements. This adjusted would almost close the deficit gap to within a <br />few thousand dollars and would be easily manageable.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.