CCP 11-22-2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Approved Norm Wells, the applicant commented that the current landscaping is pretty well in place, and there is not a great area to be landscaped. It was noted that two mature ash trees were removed as part of the first addition. Chairperson Howard asked if additional tress and shrubs can be added. Mr. Wells commented that space is an issue, but if space is available they would add the requested trees. Planner Gundlach suggested making the corners of the foundation planting areas larger. Commissioner Meyers questioned if Bell Pole is expanding its staff. Mr. Wells responded that the addition would allow office space for key sales people, as some are currently working for home. Commissioner Nichols-Matkaiti asked if the canopy tree would be problematic. Mr. Wells stated that an additional canopy tree could be a problem, as many varieties don't do well in New Brighton. Commissioner Shardlow questioned whether there is a viable solution to the odor problems. City Planner Gundlach stated that the City worked with Bell Pole about five years ago on an odor mitigation plan. The City is fairly confident that odors emanating from the stack are at a non-detect level. What was not tested was the existing treated poles that are off gassing outdoors on site. Planner Gundlach suggested maybe the treated poles injected with chemicals may be problematic with regard to odors in certain weather/wind conditions. Chairperson Howard asked the commissioners if they are comfortable approving the item, or would they like to table the item. Commissioner Shardlow stated he would feel comfortable approving, given the long term relationship the city has shared with the applicant. Commissioner Nichols-Matkaiti stated that because options may not be practical, we should not table at this time. Commissioner Danger stated that any results may take longer than one month. Motion by Commissioner McPherson, seconded by Commissioner Danger to close the Public Hearing. 7-0 Motion carried The Public Hearing was closed at 7:42 p.m. Commissioner Danger stated that while he likes to see businesses progress, he is uncomfortable with the number of non-conformities, and the fact that the applicant has not conformed in the past. City Planner Gundlach addressed the parking and storage being less than the required setback. An aerial photo was displayed, noting that if setbacks are implemented, the area of usable property is greatly reduced, it has been determined by past actions of the City Council that that is an impractical standard to impose. The City continues to look at possible reasons for the odor. Regarding the lack of concrete curbing and drive aisles; the expense associated with paving is deemed impractical. The fence height and location issue was approved in 1984 in order to address another non conformity. City Planner Gundlach explained that a Non-conforming Use Permit does allow non-conformities to exist and expand. Chairperson Howard noted staffs recommendation addresses some of the non conformities on the site. City Planner Gundlach explained that most non conformities on the site pre date the Zoning Code. Commissioner Danger commented that he wants to be sure all applicants are treated fairly. Motion by Commissioner McPherson, seconded by Commissioner Shardlow to approve staff recommendation . 7-0 Motion carried 4