Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> i <br /> i <br /> 1 RESOLUTION No. <br /> f 11-100 <br /> 1 <br /> 1 . STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> I� <br /> RESO .:JTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND NONCONFORMING USE <br /> PER1ir11T. <br /> • <br /> WHE4) AS, an application has been made by Norm Wells Architect PA on behalf of Bell Lumber <br /> & lidle Company to permit construction of a 2,304 SF second story office addition and <br /> asso 'sated surface parking at 778 1` Street NW, and, <br /> WHE AS,the procedural history of the application is as follows: <br /> I. Applications for a Site Plan and Nonconforming Use Permit were received on September 26, <br /> 011. <br /> 2. a Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing <br /> , 2 and ne at n <br /> 3. a PlanningOctober18 Co011mmissionall recommpresentendedwere given conditionalacha approvalcetofre only Octoberspeak 18the, 2011heari.g. <br /> 4. e City Council considered the request on October 25,2011. <br /> I WHE .AS,the Planning Commission and City Council make the following Findings of Fact with <br /> resps t to the Site Plan(LP2000-005)and Nonconforming Use Permit(NC2011-002): <br /> 1. 'lie property is zoned I-2,Heavy Industrial. <br /> 2. ' e property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for Business Park. <br /> 3. le applicant is proposing to construct a 2,304 SF second story office addition above the <br /> •rtion of the building constructed in 2008-2009, including construction of 11 additional <br /> rface parking stalls. <br /> 4. ' c Planning Commission and City Council considered the Site Plan in accordance with I -2 <br /> strict standards of Section 6-150, the commercial performance standards of Section 6-390, <br /> d the parking standards of Chapter 11 of the Zoning Code. <br /> 5. i e Planning Commission and City Council found all applicable Site Plan standards to be <br /> et, subject to installation of additional landscaping as outlined in the conditions of <br /> iproval. <br /> 6. e Planning Commission and City Council determined the following nonconformities <br /> • ist on the site: <br /> Parking areas less than the required setback. <br /> 1. Storage areas less than the required setback <br /> Odor detectable beyond the lot line <br /> Lack of concrete curbing & bituminous or concrete drive-aisles - i.e. dust <br /> Fence heights and locations taller than allowed by code <br /> Exterior building materials along street frontages not meeting Section 6-390 (12). <br /> 7. he Planning Commission and City Council considered the Nonconforming Use Permit in <br /> .cordance with Section 8-460 (2) and the following criteria: <br /> . The total number of nonconformities is reduced. <br /> 1 <br />