Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. <br />12-087 <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br />MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND NONCONFORMING USE <br />s, an application has been made by Joseph Wolkerstorfer on behalf of Wolkerstorfer <br />iy Inc. to permit construction of a 9,000 SF addition to the existing industrial building <br />at 348/350 1" Street SW, and, <br />1HER E AS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: <br />1. fi. pplications for a Site Plan and Nonconforming Use Permit were received on November 2, <br />2,12. <br />2. a Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing <br />o November 20, 2012 and all present were given a chance to freely speak at the hearing. <br />3. a Planning Commission recommended conditional approval on November 20, 2012. <br />4. e City Council considered the request on November 26, 2012. <br />1HEIn AS, the Planning Commission and City Council make the following Findings of Fact with <br />resp to the Site Plan (LP2012-002) and Nonconforming Use Permit (NC2012-002): <br />1. T a property is zoned I — 2, Heavy Industrial. <br />2. T a property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for HI, Heavy Industrial. <br />3. T a applicant is proposing to construct a 9,000 SF addition to the northeast side of the <br />e sting industrial building. <br />4. applicant does not propose construction of any additional off-street parking, but rather <br />pi oof-of-parking areas have been identified on the Site Plan. <br />5. T, e applicant states the number of existing off-street parking stalls will be adequate to meet <br />ad litional employee demands resulting from the proposed addition. <br />6. Planning Commission and City Council considered the Site Plan in accordance with I - 2 <br />di trict standards of Section 6-150 (refers back to 6-060), the commercial performance <br />s dards of Section 6-390, Site Plan standards of Section 8-010 and the parking standards of <br />C apter 11 of the Zoning Code. <br />7. Planning Commission and City Council found all applicable Site Plan standards to be <br />t as outlined in the Planning Report dated November 15, 2012. <br />8. Tho Planning Commission and City Council identified the following nonconformities on <br />property: <br />a. Rear yard building setback less than 20' at 18'. <br />b. Side yard parking setback (east side) less than 5' at 3.5'. <br />c. Required number of off-street parking stalls is less than required at 64 when 170 are <br />required for the existing building and an additional 23 stalls are required for the <br />proposed addition. <br />9. 1740 Planning Commission and City Council considered the Nonconforming Use Permit in <br />acMordance with Section 8-460 (2) and the following criteria: <br />