Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION No. <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND NONCONFORMING USE <br /> PERMIT. <br /> WHEREAS, an application has been made by Joseph Wolkerstorfer on behalf of Wolkerstorfer <br /> Company Inc. to permit construction of a 15,937 SF addition to the existing industrial building <br /> located at 348/350 lst Street SW, and, <br /> WHEREAS,the procedural history of the application is as follows: <br /> 1. Applications for a Site Plan and Nonconforming Use Permit were received on March 29, <br /> 2013. <br /> 2. The Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing <br /> on April 16,2013 and all present were given a chance to freely speak at the hearing. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission recommended conditional approval on April 16, 2013. <br /> 4. The City Council considered the request on April 23, 2013. <br /> WHEREAS,the Planning Commission and City Council make the following Findings of Fact with <br /> respect to the Site Plan(LP2013-003) and Nonconforming Use Permit (NC2013-002): <br /> 1. The property is zoned I—2, Heavy Industrial. <br /> 2. The property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for HI, Heavy Industrial. <br /> 3. The property is legally described as follows: <br /> Block 15 and that part of Block 16, New Brighton (now vacated), which lies West of the <br /> West right-of-way line to the State Highway Department right-of-way for Interstate <br /> Highway No. 35W, including vacated streets and alleys accruing to the premises through <br /> the vacation thereof lying Southerly of the centerline of vacated First Street South and <br /> lying Easterly of the centerline of vacated Fourth Avenue, according to the recorded plat <br /> thereof, and situate in Ramsey County, Minnesota. <br /> 4. The applicant is proposing to construct a 15,937 SF addition to the south side of the existing <br /> industrial building. <br /> 5. The applicant does not propose construction of any additional off-street parking, but rather <br /> proof-of-parking areas have been identified on the Site Plan. <br /> 6. The applicant states the number of existing off-street parking stalls will be adequate to meet <br /> additional employee demands resulting from the proposed addition. <br /> 7. The Planning Commission and City Council considered the Site Plan in accordance with I - 2 <br /> district standards of Section 6-150 (refers back to 6-060), the commercial performance <br /> standards of Section 6-390, Site Plan standards of Section 8-010 and the parking standards of <br /> Chapter 11 of the Zoning Code. <br /> 8. The Planning Commission and City Council found all applicable Site Plan standards to be <br /> met as outlined in the Planning Report dated April 10, 2013. <br /> 9. The Planning Commission and City Council identified the following nonconformities on the <br /> property: <br /> a. Rear yard building setback less than 20' at 18'. <br /> 1 <br />