CCP 07-23-2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

June 25,2013 Page 3 of 6 9.T ease Amendment Julianne Bmce&NB 10. Consideration of appointing Jack Brunell to serve on the City's Parks,Recreation& Community Center. Environmental Commission. Report No. 13-150. Resolution No. 13-048. RetNo.13-149. 11. Consider establishment of Task Force to examine Urban Fanning policies. Report No. 13-151. 10.JackBnmellto PREC. ReportNo.13-150. Councilmember Bauman thanked the Irondale High School All Knight Party Committee their donation to ResoiutionNo 13-048 the New Brighton Police Reserves. 11.Est Task Forme Ulan Fammngpolicies.Report Councilmember Jacobsen thanked all those in attendance supporting Urban F No.13-151. Motion by CouncilmemberJacobsen,seconded by Councilmember :ur appro onsent Agenda as amended removing Item 6. 5 Ayes,0 Nays-Motion Carried Public Hearing None. Council Business 1. Consideration of a Special Use ' • conforming 'ermit to allow Public Hearing construction of a detached garage exces F at 71 . 4th Avenue NW. Report No. 13-152. Resolution No. 1 1 `. City Planner Janice Gun• repo e applicant, •dd Martenson, is requesting a Special Council Business Use Permit to allow c• tion of a ached garage excess of 624 square feet. In 1. Consideration of a Spaddition, a Nonconfo in_ - Perm required beca e home's existing front yard an cial Uoe Perm and Nonconforming setback and side street setba - 1- -• ired b •de. She noted the property was Use Permit to allow zoned R-1A. ••g fron' ' setba • the existing side street setback is 8' construction of a when 30' '• . a , -d. Th, ting detached garage also does not meet the required detachedgarage in excess of 624 SF at 30' side -et setback et t was co•strutted prior to 1982 when the side street 703 4th Avenue NW. setb.' irement was on ', thus g it conforming. The original home was ReportNo.13-152. construct- 890. The app t will b emoving an existing shed in conjunction with Resolution No. 13-049 construction . - proposed 95 i uare oot garage. The proposed garage would have access off the existing . ay from t .ast. Planner Gundlach ex b -d applicant initially applied for a building permit to construct a large addition to the exi _ detached garage. After advising the applicant of the accessory structure regulations of` ction 4-530, the applicant revised his request and made application for a Special Use Permit. Sometime in mid-May, the applicant paved a small section of concrete driveway in the front yard. It is suspected this was for access to the previously planned garage and it is unclear if the applicant proposes to keep this driveway,being the revised plans show driveway access off the alleyway. The detached garage would not be used for a home occupation. Staff explained the Planning Commission met on June 18th and recommended approval of the Special Use Permit and Nonconforming Use Permit, subject to the following conditions: